Cirrus: enable Fedora 36 aarch64 tasks on EC2#14801
Cirrus: enable Fedora 36 aarch64 tasks on EC2#14801openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intocontainers:mainfrom
Conversation
57346a1 to
8785850
Compare
37bb6e9 to
48d1ba2
Compare
14cd682 to
c7a7aad
Compare
9a01a58 to
2ab62ba
Compare
@edsantiago do we not need them anymore or do you need the removal to investigate something else? |
|
All those have merged, although in slightly different form than when you rebased on them. The code that merged is Truth, and should not be clobbered by older versions. |
|
repushed and skip_if_aarch64 commented out to check for failure consistency. |
the system test failures look consistent. It's the same 2 tests failing for remote and non-remote. |
cevich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall this is a fantastic effort that should be commended. I made a few comments that should be addressed, but overall they're all pretty minor. LGTM with some minor fixups and assuming tests pass.
|
|
Oof, WTF. Doing some digging... |
|
nonono, that's just because @lsm5 tried removing something, but I guess it can't be removed. Should be easy to just add it back. |
Our VM images should be uniform across architectures. Since we're not seeing this error on the x86 tasks, something is clearly not uniform. Looking in c/automation_images, |
|
Okay, it looks like the |
new file: test/e2e/config_arm64.go Tests that fail on aarch64 have been skipped with `skip_if_aarch64`. Co-authored-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@fedoraproject.org>
|
@edsantiago @cevich removed that smallcontainer line and added python3-devel back. PTAL once again please, sorry about the PITA :( |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cevich, lsm5 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
It's no problem bud. |
|
remote is a flake which should go away as soon as #15090 merges. |
|
LGTM but that Thanks for your perseverance @lsm5. |
vrothberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
Thanks everybody for working on this. I am very excited!
|
/hold cancel |
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar lsm5@fedoraproject.org
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Piggybacks on #14569