Skip to content

Cirrus: enable Fedora 36 aarch64 tasks on EC2#14801

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intocontainers:mainfrom
lsm5:ec2-aarch64
Jul 28, 2022
Merged

Cirrus: enable Fedora 36 aarch64 tasks on EC2#14801
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intocontainers:mainfrom
lsm5:ec2-aarch64

Conversation

@lsm5
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 commented Jul 1, 2022

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar lsm5@fedoraproject.org

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Piggybacks on #14569

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 1, 2022
@lsm5 lsm5 force-pushed the ec2-aarch64 branch 5 times, most recently from 57346a1 to 8785850 Compare July 1, 2022 14:58
@lsm5 lsm5 force-pushed the ec2-aarch64 branch 8 times, most recently from 37bb6e9 to 48d1ba2 Compare July 1, 2022 19:36
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cevich cevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good so far

@lsm5 lsm5 force-pushed the ec2-aarch64 branch 2 times, most recently from 14cd682 to c7a7aad Compare July 1, 2022 20:08
@lsm5 lsm5 force-pushed the ec2-aarch64 branch 5 times, most recently from 9a01a58 to 2ab62ba Compare July 4, 2022 18:39
@lsm5
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

lsm5 commented Jul 26, 2022

Next time you rebase, please remove the 761e9f2 commit; and I think you can remove 8d9b7ca and 6b5c467 as well

@edsantiago do we not need them anymore or do you need the removal to investigate something else?

@edsantiago
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

All those have merged, although in slightly different form than when you rebased on them. The code that merged is Truth, and should not be clobbered by older versions.

@lsm5
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

lsm5 commented Jul 26, 2022

repushed and skip_if_aarch64 commented out to check for failure consistency.

@lsm5
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

lsm5 commented Jul 26, 2022

I notice you didn't skip any of the SELinux tests. Did that get resolved with the new images?

the last failure only showed the system test failures and nothing else (i guess others were cancelled). I'll see how this run goes.

the system test failures look consistent. It's the same 2 tests failing for remote and non-remote.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cevich cevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall this is a fantastic effort that should be commended. I made a few comments that should be addressed, but overall they're all pretty minor. LGTM with some minor fixups and assuming tests pass.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cevich cevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@edsantiago
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

        _ruamel_yaml.c:6:10: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory
            6 | #include "Python.h"
              |          ^~~~~~~~~~

@cevich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cevich commented Jul 27, 2022

Oof, WTF. Doing some digging...

@edsantiago
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

nonono, that's just because @lsm5 tried removing something, but I guess it can't be removed. Should be easy to just add it back.

@cevich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cevich commented Jul 27, 2022

nonono, that's just because @lsm5 tried removing something, but I guess it can't be removed. Should be easy to just add it back.

Our VM images should be uniform across architectures. Since we're not seeing this error on the x86 tasks, something is clearly not uniform.

Looking in c/automation_images, cache_images/fedora_packaging.sh we don't mention python-devel anywhere. I'm taking a quick poke around to see if I can find where it gets brought.

@cevich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cevich commented Jul 27, 2022

Okay, it looks like the python-devel is missing from the regular images too. If you want to add back in the dnf install for those two tasks (Validate and consistency?) I think there's no need to check the architecture, just always install it. Maybe drop a TODO comment suggesting we bundle it into the images for stability. But I don't see that work as critical ATM.

@cevich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cevich commented Jul 27, 2022

Opened containers/automation_images#159

new file:   test/e2e/config_arm64.go

Tests that fail on aarch64 have been skipped with
`skip_if_aarch64`.

Co-authored-by: Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@fedoraproject.org>
@lsm5
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

lsm5 commented Jul 27, 2022

@edsantiago @cevich removed that smallcontainer line and added python3-devel back. PTAL once again please, sorry about the PITA :(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cevich cevich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 27, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cevich, lsm5

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cevich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cevich commented Jul 27, 2022

sorry about the PITA :(

It's no problem bud.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

remote is a flake which should go away as soon as #15090 merges.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM but that resource flake is going to cause a lot of pain. I foresee an immediate followup PR to skip it.

Thanks for your perseverance @lsm5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks everybody for working on this. I am very excited!

@vrothberg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/hold cancel

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants