Skip to content

Conversation

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Member

@dmcgowan dmcgowan commented Nov 30, 2023

For further discussion on 2.0 package layout

Example core packages would be:

  • content
  • containers
  • diff
  • images
  • leases
  • remotes
  • runtime
  • sandbox
  • snapshots
  • pkg/streaming
  • pkg/transfer
  • pkg/unpack

Internal package candidates would be (will be checked against pkg.go.dev reported importers):

  • pkg/cleanup
  • pkg/failpoint
  • pkg/hasher
  • pkg/kmutex
  • pkg/randutil
  • pkg/registrar
  • pkg/testutil
  • pkg/tomlext
  • pkg/truncindex

Related to #9365

Copy link
Member

@fuweid fuweid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

If here is good candidate category name for a set of packages in pkg, containerd should move the packages out of pkg. Before that, I like pkg personally, because I don't get lost in a lot of packages in root path.

Copy link
Member

@samuelkarp samuelkarp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcg.dev>
@dmcgowan dmcgowan force-pushed the update-contributing-root-packages branch from 4fc2d96 to 96aaf5a Compare December 1, 2023 19:34
@fuweid fuweid enabled auto-merge December 2, 2023 01:45
@fuweid fuweid added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2023
Merged via the queue into containerd:main with commit 87bf39a Dec 4, 2023
@dmcgowan dmcgowan deleted the update-contributing-root-packages branch April 20, 2024 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants