Skip to content

Conversation

@fidencio
Copy link
Contributor

@fidencio fidencio commented Jul 7, 2025

When using blockfile snapshotter and passing specific filesystem mount options, the users may be caught by surprise by the fact that some options are required but not documented anywhere.

The easiest way to solve this is by ensuring that the "loop" required option is always added to the mount options.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @fidencio. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a containerd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@fidencio fidencio force-pushed the topic/blockfile-ensure-loop-is-part-of-the-mount-options branch from 247f171 to a7c7478 Compare July 7, 2025 13:45
@fidencio fidencio force-pushed the topic/blockfile-ensure-loop-is-part-of-the-mount-options branch from a7c7478 to 6408813 Compare July 7, 2025 15:22
@djdongjin
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

When using blockfile snapshotter and passing specific filesystem mount
options, the users may be caught by surprise by the fact that some
options are required but not documented anywhere.

The easiest way to solve this is by ensuring that the "loop" required
option is always added to the mount options.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@northflank.com>
@fidencio fidencio force-pushed the topic/blockfile-ensure-loop-is-part-of-the-mount-options branch from 6408813 to e0d733c Compare July 7, 2025 20:36
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Triage to Review In Progress in Pull Request Review Jul 7, 2025
@djdongjin
Copy link
Member

/retest

@dmcgowan dmcgowan added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 8, 2025
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 8, 2025
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 8, 2025
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2025
…s-part-of-the-mount-options

blockfile: Ensure required options are always set
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 8, 2025
@dmcgowan dmcgowan added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into containerd:main with commit 4fe6eb2 Jul 8, 2025
87 of 91 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review In Progress to Done in Pull Request Review Jul 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants