Skip to content

Revert "use go v1.18 and update dependencies"#528

Merged
saad-ali merged 1 commit into
container-storage-interface:masterfrom
humblec:revert-go-version
Oct 31, 2022
Merged

Revert "use go v1.18 and update dependencies"#528
saad-ali merged 1 commit into
container-storage-interface:masterfrom
humblec:revert-go-version

Conversation

@humblec

@humblec humblec commented Oct 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Additional Info#
This reverts commit 150c9d9 partially.
It keep the go.mod module version to 1.18 but leave old versions of genproto.
Dropping this dependency back to its prior level would help downstreams avoid pulling in a ton of extra deps till we figure out how to consume bits from genproto in a more isolated way

Ref# 150c9d9#r87967287

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce an API-breaking change?:

none

@humblec

humblec commented Oct 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Cc @liggitt

@bertinatto

Copy link
Copy Markdown

/assign @saad-ali @jdef
Who LGTM'd the previous PR.

@liggitt

liggitt commented Oct 27, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The go1.18 change was fine, the genproto bump was the issue

@bertinatto

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Also, note that v1.5.2 is not the latest version of protobuf. The module has been renamed and migrated to https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf-go.

This reverts commit 150c9d9 partially.
It keep the go.mod module version to 1.18 but leave old versions of
genproto.

@jdef jdef left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jdef

jdef commented Oct 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@saad-ali it seems this would be worth cherry-picking for 1.7

@saad-ali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

Will merge and cherry pick to 1.7

@saad-ali

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is there a related bug or issue where this was discussed? Curious who/where the related issues were caught?

@saad-ali saad-ali left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@saad-ali saad-ali merged commit 9358408 into container-storage-interface:master Oct 31, 2022
saad-ali added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2022
@humblec

humblec commented Nov 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Is there a related bug or issue where this was discussed? Curious who/where the related issues were caught?

@saad-ali The references I have here is the one in PR description (150c9d9#r87967287) from @liggitt

@liggitt

liggitt commented Nov 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See kubernetes/kubernetes#113366

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants