Enable test suite of libarrow#1058
Conversation
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
26074b3 to
afb81ea
Compare
) ### Rationale for this change Enable tests for libarrow in conda-forge: #35587 ### What changes are included in this PR? old glibc does not actually support timezones like `-0117` (used in `StrptimeZoneOffset` test). The exact lower bound for glibc is hard for me to determine; I know that it passes with 2.28 and that it fails with 2.17. Anything in between is an open question. I went with the conservative option here. ### Are these changes tested? Tested in conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock#1058 ### Are there any user-facing changes? * GitHub Issue: #43808 Lead-authored-by: H. Vetinari <h.vetinari@gmx.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
except those depending on timing, following upstream, see https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/apache-arrow-12.0.0/ci/appveyor-cpp-build.bat#L63-L68
also requires git submodule for parquet test data
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( I do have some suggestions for making it better though... For recipe/meta.yaml:
This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12000178104. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail. |
cannot run test suite without an actual GPU
libarrowlibarrow
|
Alrighty, after over 2 years of working towards this, we now have the C++ tests running for |
Enable test suite of `libarrow`
…621) ### Rationale for this change Enable tests for libarrow in conda-forge: apache/arrow#35587 ### What changes are included in this PR? old glibc does not actually support timezones like `-0117` (used in `StrptimeZoneOffset` test). The exact lower bound for glibc is hard for me to determine; I know that it passes with 2.28 and that it fails with 2.17. Anything in between is an open question. I went with the conservative option here. ### Are these changes tested? Tested in conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock#1058 ### Are there any user-facing changes? * GitHub Issue: #43808 Lead-authored-by: H. Vetinari <h.vetinari@gmx.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Since #875, we're now running with the test suite for
pyarrow. While working on #1048, I wanted to ensure that also the library portion works as intended, so thought about switching on the test suite forlibarrow.After some initial attempts it looks like this is failing, hence will need some iteration together with upstream.