perf(mempool): get peer state once on broadcast routine#3430
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call `peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)` that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible because `PeerState` is set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset. <!-- Please add a reference to the issue that this PR addresses and indicate which files are most critical to review. If it fully addresses a particular issue, please include "Closes #XXX" (where "XXX" is the issue number). If this PR is non-trivial/large/complex, please ensure that you have either created an issue that the team's had a chance to respond to, or had some discussion with the team prior to submitting substantial pull requests. The team can be reached via GitHub Discussions or the Cosmos Network Discord server in the #cometbft channel. GitHub Discussions is preferred over Discord as it allows us to keep track of conversations topically. https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/discussions If the work in this PR is not aligned with the team's current priorities, please be advised that it may take some time before it is merged - especially if it has not yet been discussed with the team. See the project board for the team's current priorities: https://github.com/orgs/cometbft/projects/1 --> --- #### PR checklist - [ ] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 890c241)
4 tasks
hvanz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
…) (#3432) In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call `peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)` that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible because `PeerState` is set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset. --- #### PR checklist - [ ] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #3430 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Hernán Vanzetto <15466498+hvanz@users.noreply.github.com>
2 tasks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
… fails (#3647) Fixes a bug introduced in #3459 where instead of retrying the same tx when the peer is lagging, it was skipping it and moving on to the next entry. The same used to happen when sending the transaction failed: instead of retrying to send, it skipped it and proceeded to the next tx. This PR also reverts #3430, which was not working as expected. Note that the first commit introduces a new test `TestMempoolReactorSendLaggingPeer` that initially fails and then it's fixed: https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/actions/runs/10300181146/job/28509056466?pr=3647 --- #### PR checklist - [X] Tests written/updated - ~~[ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog)~~ - ~~[ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments~~ - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
… fails (#3647) Fixes a bug introduced in #3459 where instead of retrying the same tx when the peer is lagging, it was skipping it and moving on to the next entry. The same used to happen when sending the transaction failed: instead of retrying to send, it skipped it and proceeded to the next tx. This PR also reverts #3430, which was not working as expected. Note that the first commit introduces a new test `TestMempoolReactorSendLaggingPeer` that initially fails and then it's fixed: https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/actions/runs/10300181146/job/28509056466?pr=3647 --- #### PR checklist - [X] Tests written/updated - ~~[ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog)~~ - ~~[ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments~~ - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec (cherry picked from commit 1ac8832) # Conflicts: # mempool/reactor.go
Merged
2 tasks
hvanz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
… fails (backport #3647) (#3657) Fixes a bug introduced in #3459 where instead of retrying the same tx when the peer is lagging, it was skipping it and moving on to the next entry. The same used to happen when sending the transaction failed: instead of retrying to send, it skipped it and proceeded to the next tx. This PR also reverts #3430, which was not working as expected. Note that the first commit introduces a new test `TestMempoolReactorSendLaggingPeer` that initially fails and then it's fixed: https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/actions/runs/10300181146/job/28509056466?pr=3647 --- #### PR checklist - [X] Tests written/updated - ~~[ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog)~~ - ~~[ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments~~ - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #3647 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Hernán Vanzetto <15466498+hvanz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: hvanz <hernan.vanzetto@gmail.com>
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2024
… fails (#3647) Fixes a bug introduced in #3459 where instead of retrying the same tx when the peer is lagging, it was skipping it and moving on to the next entry. The same used to happen when sending the transaction failed: instead of retrying to send, it skipped it and proceeded to the next tx. This PR also reverts #3430, which was not working as expected. Note that the first commit introduces a new test `TestMempoolReactorSendLaggingPeer` that initially fails and then it's fixed: https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/actions/runs/10300181146/job/28509056466?pr=3647 --- #### PR checklist - [X] Tests written/updated - ~~[ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog)~~ - ~~[ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments~~ - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec (cherry picked from commit 1ac8832) # Conflicts: # mempool/reactor_test.go
Merged
2 tasks
hvanz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2024
… fails (backport #3647) (#4109) Fixes a bug introduced in #3459 where instead of retrying the same tx when the peer is lagging, it was skipping it and moving on to the next entry. The same used to happen when sending the transaction failed: instead of retrying to send, it skipped it and proceeded to the next tx. This PR also reverts #3430, which was not working as expected. Note that the first commit introduces a new test `TestMempoolReactorSendLaggingPeer` that initially fails and then it's fixed: https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/actions/runs/10300181146/job/28509056466?pr=3647 --- #### PR checklist - [X] Tests written/updated - ~~[ ] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog)~~ - ~~[ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments~~ - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #3647 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Hernán Vanzetto <15466498+hvanz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: hvanz <hernan.vanzetto@gmail.com>
mattac21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2025
In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call `peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)` that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible because `PeerState` is set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset. <!-- Please add a reference to the issue that this PR addresses and indicate which files are most critical to review. If it fully addresses a particular issue, please include "Closes #XXX" (where "XXX" is the issue number). If this PR is non-trivial/large/complex, please ensure that you have either created an issue that the team's had a chance to respond to, or had some discussion with the team prior to submitting substantial pull requests. The team can be reached via GitHub Discussions or the Cosmos Network Discord server in the #cometbft channel. GitHub Discussions is preferred over Discord as it allows us to keep track of conversations topically. https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/discussions If the work in this PR is not aligned with the team's current priorities, please be advised that it may take some time before it is merged - especially if it has not yet been discussed with the team. See the project board for the team's current priorities: https://github.com/orgs/cometbft/projects/1 --> --- - [ ] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
mattac21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2025
In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call `peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)` that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible because `PeerState` is set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset. <!-- Please add a reference to the issue that this PR addresses and indicate which files are most critical to review. If it fully addresses a particular issue, please include "Closes #XXX" (where "XXX" is the issue number). If this PR is non-trivial/large/complex, please ensure that you have either created an issue that the team's had a chance to respond to, or had some discussion with the team prior to submitting substantial pull requests. The team can be reached via GitHub Discussions or the Cosmos Network Discord server in the #cometbft channel. GitHub Discussions is preferred over Discord as it allows us to keep track of conversations topically. https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/discussions If the work in this PR is not aligned with the team's current priorities, please be advised that it may take some time before it is merged - especially if it has not yet been discussed with the team. See the project board for the team's current priorities: https://github.com/orgs/cometbft/projects/1 --> --- - [ ] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
mattac21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2025
In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call `peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)` that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible because `PeerState` is set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset. <!-- Please add a reference to the issue that this PR addresses and indicate which files are most critical to review. If it fully addresses a particular issue, please include "Closes #XXX" (where "XXX" is the issue number). If this PR is non-trivial/large/complex, please ensure that you have either created an issue that the team's had a chance to respond to, or had some discussion with the team prior to submitting substantial pull requests. The team can be reached via GitHub Discussions or the Cosmos Network Discord server in the #cometbft channel. GitHub Discussions is preferred over Discord as it allows us to keep track of conversations topically. https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/discussions If the work in this PR is not aligned with the team's current priorities, please be advised that it may take some time before it is merged - especially if it has not yet been discussed with the team. See the project board for the team's current priorities: https://github.com/orgs/cometbft/projects/1 --> --- - [ ] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
mattac21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2025
In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call `peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)` that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible because `PeerState` is set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset. <!-- Please add a reference to the issue that this PR addresses and indicate which files are most critical to review. If it fully addresses a particular issue, please include "Closes #XXX" (where "XXX" is the issue number). If this PR is non-trivial/large/complex, please ensure that you have either created an issue that the team's had a chance to respond to, or had some discussion with the team prior to submitting substantial pull requests. The team can be reached via GitHub Discussions or the Cosmos Network Discord server in the #cometbft channel. GitHub Discussions is preferred over Discord as it allows us to keep track of conversations topically. https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/discussions If the work in this PR is not aligned with the team's current priorities, please be advised that it may take some time before it is merged - especially if it has not yet been discussed with the team. See the project board for the team's current priorities: https://github.com/orgs/cometbft/projects/1 --> --- - [ ] Tests written/updated - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [ ] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec --------- Co-authored-by: Anton Kaliaev <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In each broadcast routine, before sending a transaction, we read the peer's state so we can compare the height of the transaction against the peer's height. So, for each transaction we want to send, we call
peer.Get(types.PeerStateKey).(PeerState)that reads the (pointer to the) peer's state. This PR makes this call once, before starting the loop through the list of transactions. This is possible becausePeerStateis set once (on the consensus reactor) and never unset.PR checklist
.changelog(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/orspec/) and code comments