perf(event bus): Remove expensive Logger debug call in PublishEventTx#2911
Merged
andynog merged 2 commits intocometbft:mainfrom Apr 29, 2024
Merged
Conversation
andynog
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
Collaborator
andynog
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me, I don't see any value on logging these messages and seems that removing them will only benefit performance. Thanks @ValarDragon
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
…#2911) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec (cherry picked from commit ce68e90) # Conflicts: # types/event_bus.go
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
…#2911) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec (cherry picked from commit ce68e90)
4 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
…#2911) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec (cherry picked from commit ce68e90) # Conflicts: # types/event_bus.go
This was referenced Apr 29, 2024
andynog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
… (backport #2911) (#2935) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com>
andynog
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
… (backport #2911) (#2936) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev>
andynog
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
… (backport #2911) (#2937) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request #2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev>
czarcas7ic
pushed a commit
to osmosis-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev>
Merged
7 tasks
czarcas7ic
added a commit
to osmosis-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev>
mergify bot
added a commit
to osmosis-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd)
mergify bot
added a commit
to osmosis-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd)
7 tasks
7 tasks
czarcas7ic
added a commit
to osmosis-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) (#44) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd) Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <adam@osmosis.team>
czarcas7ic
added a commit
to osmosis-labs/cometbft
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) (#45) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <ValarDragon@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <me@andynogueira.dev> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd) Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <adam@osmosis.team>
3 tasks
mattac21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2025
…#2911) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
mattac21
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2025
…#2911) Component of #2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Component of #2869
This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now.
I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these.
PR checklist
.changelog(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/orspec/) and code comments