Seems like they both serve the same purpose of getting data from the parent.
ParentResourceFieldResolver works on table columns (probably should be called ParentColumnResolver) and goes only 1 level deep.
ParentPathResolver works on structs and can go any level deep.
Maybe we should only have a single API to access parent data? Also I think we should probably only access table columns as accessing struct data misses any post resolving done by the parent resource
Seems like they both serve the same purpose of getting data from the parent.
ParentResourceFieldResolverworks on table columns (probably should be calledParentColumnResolver) and goes only 1 level deep.ParentPathResolverworks on structs and can go any level deep.Maybe we should only have a single API to access parent data? Also I think we should probably only access table columns as accessing struct data misses any post resolving done by the parent resource