Skip to content

fix: Progressbar handling#336

Merged
disq merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/progressbar-handling
Jun 6, 2024
Merged

fix: Progressbar handling#336
disq merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/progressbar-handling

Conversation

@disq
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@disq disq commented Jun 6, 2024

Adds option to skip using progressbar. Since the new progressbar release, writing to the progressbar where the target writer is closed (in our case, os.Stdout) produces an error.

@disq disq requested review from a team and marianogappa and removed request for a team June 6, 2024 08:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Jun 6, 2024
@disq disq changed the title fix: Progressbar handling fix!: Progressbar handling Jun 6, 2024
@disq disq requested a review from erezrokah June 6, 2024 08:49
@erezrokah erezrokah changed the title fix!: Progressbar handling fix: Progressbar handling Jun 6, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@erezrokah erezrokah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but I think we can skip the major bump. Don't think anything else is using this API other than the CLI, and if we do an major bump we need to update all improves and the version in go.mod

@disq disq merged commit 538487d into main Jun 6, 2024
@disq disq deleted the fix/progressbar-handling branch June 6, 2024 09:11
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [1.19.19](v1.19.18...v1.19.19) (2024-06-06)


### Bug Fixes

* Progressbar handling ([#336](#336)) ([538487d](538487d))
* Revert "fix(deps): Update module github.com/schollz/progressbar/v3 to v3.14.3 ([#330](#330))" ([#338](#338)) ([74429d5](74429d5))

---
This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit to cloudquery/cloudquery that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants