Skip to content

do not trigger ci if you don't need it#3552

Merged
anonrig merged 2 commits intomainfrom
yagiz/improve-github-workflows
Feb 18, 2025
Merged

do not trigger ci if you don't need it#3552
anonrig merged 2 commits intomainfrom
yagiz/improve-github-workflows

Conversation

@anonrig
Copy link
Member

@anonrig anonrig commented Feb 14, 2025

let's limit our scope for triggering ci

@anonrig anonrig requested review from a team as code owners February 14, 2025 16:22
@anonrig anonrig force-pushed the yagiz/improve-github-workflows branch from 941ce95 to 888ffa1 Compare February 18, 2025 20:41
@anonrig anonrig requested review from fhanau, jasnell and mikea February 18, 2025 20:42
@anonrig anonrig enabled auto-merge (squash) February 18, 2025 20:42
Copy link
Contributor

@fhanau fhanau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM. Also noticed today that doc/** needs to be docs/** instead, maybe we can fit that in here.

@anonrig anonrig merged commit 69e16cf into main Feb 18, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@anonrig anonrig deleted the yagiz/improve-github-workflows branch February 18, 2025 20:51
@anonrig
Copy link
Member Author

anonrig commented Feb 18, 2025

It was on auto-merge. We can fix it on a new PR

yj7o5 pushed a commit to yj7o5/workerd that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
* do not trigger ci if you don't need it

* do not run internal build on .github change
@mikea
Copy link
Contributor

mikea commented Jun 12, 2025

This makes it impossible to submit doc-only change, which imo defeats the purpose of this change to land such PRs faster?

I suggest reverting this, since this is not the first time we hit it. I don't think protected branch configuration is flexible enough to conditionally require builds, is it @danlapid ?

@fhanau

@mikea mikea mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2025
gabivlj pushed a commit to gabivlj/workerd that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
* do not trigger ci if you don't need it

* do not run internal build on .github change
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants