[Pipelines] Clarify Wrangler get supports names and IDs#31025
Conversation
|
This pull request requires reviews from CODEOWNERS as it changes files that match the following patterns:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clean docs clarification. No issues found.
The changes consistently update command examples across all Pipelines docs pages to show that both resource IDs and names are accepted, and the new note on the Wrangler reference page adds helpful context. Also fixes the missing trailing newline in .
|
Correction to my review text above (shell escaping ate the backtick-wrapped words):
No issues found — approving. |
|
Posted an approving review on PR #31025. What was reviewed:
Result: No issues found. The diff is consistent, follows the style guide, links are correct, and the scope is clean. The review is approved and ready for merge. |
|
Hey there, we've marked this pull request as stale because there's no recent activity on it. This label helps us identify PRs that might need updates (or to be closed out by our team if no longer relevant). |
Summary
Clarifying usage of IDs OR names in pipelines subcommands.
cloudflare/workers-sdk#13960
Screenshots (optional)
Documentation checklist