news/blog: Initial submission of RocksDB Tuning Deep Dive#413
news/blog: Initial submission of RocksDB Tuning Deep Dive#413
Conversation
|
Looks like there's some issue with side-by-side images. Probably could clean up some other things to look a bit better too. Current View: |
|
@Thingee Should I just combine the side-by-side graphs into one image? Also, looks like I've got something kind of funky going on with some of the tables. Maybe the syntax being used or something. I'll take a look later. I think I'm going to unquote some of the setting names as well since it seems like it's getting too cluttered. |
77ecd39 to
e5ba647
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,301 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: Ceph RocksDB Tuning Deep-Dive | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I'd like to leave this as a standalone article this time. Most of the testing was on Pacific and the main thrust of the article is about the RocksDb settings which are mostly release-agnostic. It might make sense to have a separate Quincy performance article but this one probably isn't it.
| --- | ||
| title: Ceph RocksDB Tuning Deep-Dive | ||
| date: 2022-07-14 | ||
| image: images/octopus.jpg |
Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
e5ba647 to
e370e29
Compare
ceph/ceph.io#413 Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
ceph/ceph.io#413 Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
Change RocksDB options based on research findings documented here: ceph/ceph.io#413 Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
Change RocksDB options based on research findings documented here: ceph/ceph.io#413 Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
Change RocksDB options based on research findings documented here: ceph/ceph.io#413 Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com> Conflicts: src/common/options/global.yaml.in
Initial submission of the RocksDB Tuning Deep Dive Article.
Signed-off-by: Mark Nelson mnelson@redhat.com