Skip to content

qa/distros: add ubuntu 24.04 as supported distro/container host#63912

Closed
cbodley wants to merge 8 commits intoceph:mainfrom
cbodley:wip-qa-distros-t
Closed

qa/distros: add ubuntu 24.04 as supported distro/container host#63912
cbodley wants to merge 8 commits intoceph:mainfrom
cbodley:wip-qa-distros-t

Conversation

@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor

@cbodley cbodley commented Jun 12, 2025

once ubuntu 24 packages are made available in shaman (depends on https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66914), we can start testing them in teuthology

  • replace any subsuite distro folders that only contain ubuntu_latest,centos_latest with a symlink to supported-random-distro$ so they'll pick up the changes there
  • bump the ubuntu_latest.yaml symlink to 24.04
  • add 22.04 back as supported so users of supported-random-distro$ will test both ubuntu versions
  • add ubuntu 24.04 as a supported container host for cephadm suites
Show available Jenkins commands

@github-actions github-actions bot added cephfs Ceph File System tests labels Jun 12, 2025
@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbodley commented Jun 18, 2025

we got a successful build of ubuntu noble packages in https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/wip-kefu-pr-64001/ so i tried scheduling this suite-branch against it, but all of the jobs that selected ubuntu_latest (now 24.04) failed with:

Packages for os_type 'ubuntu', flavor default and ceph hash '04324fa1ac1916b7a3db7928b26d4660c099d35c' not found

@cbodley cbodley mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Merged
@ljflores
Copy link
Member

ljflores commented Jul 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I scheduled a rados suite against this build: https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/main/94b8a156e3c59813b5354f484da97122b49be851/

./teuthology/virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite -v -m smithi -c main -S 94b8a156e3c59813b5354f484da97122b49be851 --suite-repo https://github.com/cbodley/ceph.git --suite-branch wip-qa-distros-t -s rados --subset 111/120000 -p 150

https://pulpito.ceph.com/lflores-2025-07-10_16:37:06-rados-main-distro-default-smithi/

@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbodley commented Jul 11, 2025

example from https://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/lflores-2025-07-10_16:37:06-rados-main-distro-default-smithi/8380254/teuthology.log:

2025-07-11T08:45:52.041 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.smithi090.stdout:The following packages have unmet dependencies:
2025-07-11T08:45:52.153 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.smithi090.stdout: ceph-mgr : Depends: python3-distutils but it is not installable
2025-07-11T08:45:52.153 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.smithi090.stdout:            Recommends: ceph-mgr-dashboard but it is not going to be installed
2025-07-11T08:45:52.153 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.smithi090.stdout:            Recommends: ceph-mgr-diskprediction-local but it is not going to be installed
2025-07-11T08:45:52.153 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.smithi090.stdout:            Recommends: ceph-mgr-k8sevents but it is not going to be installed
2025-07-11T08:45:52.153 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.smithi090.stdout:            Recommends: ceph-mgr-cephadm but it is not going to be installed

this was resolved with #64386 for https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/72020. but package installation still fails due to https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/72083

@cbodley cbodley mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2025
Merged
14 tasks
@cbodley cbodley force-pushed the wip-qa-distros-t branch from b94efca to 7947a7c Compare July 29, 2025 13:50
@cbodley cbodley marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2025 16:28
@Naveenaidu Naveenaidu mentioned this pull request Aug 19, 2025
Open
14 tasks
@cbodley cbodley mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2025
Merged
@adk3798
Copy link
Contributor

adk3798 commented Sep 10, 2025

Did this orch run just for noble https://pulpito.ceph.com/adking-2025-09-09_01:28:09-orch:cephadm-wip-adk2-testing-2025-09-08-1425-distro-default-smithi/. It looks like the nvme-loop task will have to be updated to work with noble at the least. For whatever reason a bunch of tests timed out reimaging machines as well. Didn't bother with reruns since I know we need the nvme-loop changes

@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbodley commented Sep 10, 2025

It looks like the nvme-loop task will have to be updated to work with noble at the least

thanks @adk3798 - does this deserve a tracker issue? is it clear who's responsible?

@adk3798
Copy link
Contributor

adk3798 commented Sep 10, 2025

It looks like the nvme-loop task will have to be updated to work with noble at the least

thanks @adk3798 - does this deserve a tracker issue? is it clear who's responsible?

Guillaume and I have fixed that up in the past. I guess we might as well have a tracker, especially if we plan to backport this to tentacle

@adk3798
Copy link
Contributor

adk3798 commented Sep 16, 2025

It looks like the nvme-loop task will have to be updated to work with noble at the least

thanks @adk3798 - does this deserve a tracker issue? is it clear who's responsible?

I've added a commit to your branch that I think should fix the nvme_loop task for ubuntu noble. If you'd prefer it be its own separate PR I can create one. Either way, will do another test run

adk3798
adk3798 approved these changes Sep 17, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@adk3798 adk3798 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

with the new commit to fix nvme_loop, orch run on noble looks good https://pulpito.ceph.com/adking-2025-09-17_13:14:17-orch:cephadm-wip-adk2-testing-2025-09-16-1635-distro-default-smithi/, just one known issue failure and a bunch of tests that failed to re-image machines.

@cbodley did you also see imaging issues in any of your runs? I'm approving since it's not an orch related thing, but I've now seen a number of those in both runs I've done. I could also just be unlucky.

@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbodley commented Sep 17, 2025

@cbodley did you also see imaging issues in any of your runs?

@adk3798 i do remember seeing some failures like that, but it's been a while since i tried schedule against ubuntu 24

cbodley and others added 8 commits October 17, 2025 15:55
@cbodley
qa/cephmetrics: symlink supported-random-distro$
062d640 
Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
@cbodley
qa/fs/fscrypt: symlink supported-random-distro$
30fdaf3 
Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
@cbodley
qa/ceph-ansible: symlink supported-random-distro$
57ccee5 
Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
@cbodley
qa/ceph-deploy: symlink supported-random-distro$
dd7a284 
Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
@cbodley
qa/distros: add all/ubuntu_24.04.yaml
cc0afb5 
Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
@cbodley
qa/distros: bump ubuntu_latest.yaml to 24.04
6191951 
and add ubuntu_22.04.yaml back to distros/supported and
distros/supported-random-distro$

Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
@cbodley
qa/distros: add ubuntu_24.04 as supported container host
77f2a3a 
Signed-off-by: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>
CEPH-BUILD-JOB: ceph-dev-pipeline
DISTROS: noble jammy centos9
ARCHS: x86_64
FLAVORS: default
@adk3798 @cbodley
qa/tasks/nvme_loop: fix nvme loop task for ubuntu noble
5eabec9 
Compared to older distros, this one complains if
you include `-q hostnqn` in the nvme connect command,
saying "Failed to write to /dev/nvme-fabrics: Invalid argument".
Removing that argument gets passed that error and
doesn't seem to have any downsides

Signed-off-by: Adam King <adking@redhat.com>
@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbodley commented Oct 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

pushed a rebase

i also prepared a branch, based on this one, that goes on to add yamls for rocky 10 in https://github.com/cbodley/ceph/commits/wip-qa-distros-t-rocky. but we're not producing rocky 10 builds yet to test

@cbodley cbodley mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Merged
@cbodley
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbodley commented Oct 24, 2025

i also prepared a branch, based on this one, that goes on to add yamls for rocky 10 in https://github.com/cbodley/ceph/commits/wip-qa-distros-t-rocky. but we're not producing rocky 10 builds yet to test

raised a draft pr #66055 with just the rocky bits (not based on this pr)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 23, 2025
@cbodley cbodley removed the stale label Jan 6, 2026
@ceph ceph deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 5, 2026
@batrick batrick mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2026
Draft
14 tasks
@batrick
Copy link
Member

batrick commented Mar 5, 2026

Moving to #67683.

Thanks for starting this @cbodley

@batrick batrick closed this Mar 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@adk3798 adk3798 adk3798 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

cephfs Ceph File System tests wip-adk2-testing

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@cbodley @ljflores @adk3798 @batrick @yuriw