sequencer: Use higher sequencer drift for Celo#251
Merged
Conversation
piersy
reviewed
Oct 7, 2024
Comment on lines
+30
to
+34
| // Normal OP chains wait for five confirmations while Celo waits for finalization, which can take | ||
| // up to 3 * 32 blocks. So we should allow for more drift to compensate. | ||
| // 3 * 32 - 5 = 91 blocks | ||
| // 91 * 12s block time = 1092 | ||
| const maxSequencerDriftCelo = maxSequencerDriftFjord + 1092 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Im a bit confused about the logic here.
The op calculation seems like it took the 5 block times = 60s and then multiplied by a factor of 30 to reach 1800. So for us that would be 33212*30 = 34560.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The question is, "do you really want the buffer to be a multiple of the minimum required drift?". I don't think so, but it really depends on unprovable assumptions. See also https://github.com/celo-org/celo-blockchain-planning/issues/629#issuecomment-2396351090 .
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok makes sense, I guess we just don't know how it was calculated, but yes almost 10 hours (34560s) does seem like an excessive time.
piersy
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2024
2 tasks
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2024
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2024
alecps
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2024
alecps
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2024
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 16, 2024
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2025
Kourin1996
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2025
gastonponti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2025
gastonponti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2025
gastonponti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
gastonponti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2026
piersy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2026
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2026
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
karlb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes https://github.com/celo-org/celo-blockchain-planning/issues/629
Alternative to #244.