Skip to content

chore: Provide a suggestion for pr 22396, new structure#22491

Merged
emrysal merged 7 commits intoadd-form-identifier-to-responsefrom
chore/suggestion-for-structure-routingResponseData
Jul 16, 2025
Merged

chore: Provide a suggestion for pr 22396, new structure#22491
emrysal merged 7 commits intoadd-form-identifier-to-responsefrom
chore/suggestion-for-structure-routingResponseData

Conversation

@emrysal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@emrysal emrysal commented Jul 14, 2025

What does this PR do?

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@keithwillcode keithwillcode added core area: core, team members only foundation labels Jul 14, 2025
@delve-auditor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

delve-auditor bot commented Jul 14, 2025

No security or compliance issues detected. Reviewed everything up to db2d380.

Security Overview
  • 🔎 Scanned files: 12 changed file(s)
Detected Code Changes
Change Type Relevant files
Enhancement ► routingResponseData.ts
    Add form identifier to response

Reply to this PR with @delve-auditor followed by a description of what change you want and we'll auto-submit a change to this PR to implement it.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Jul 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
cal ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 16, 2025 9:40pm
cal-eu ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 16, 2025 9:40pm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@joeauyeung joeauyeung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed and working

@emrysal emrysal marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2025 21:20
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team July 16, 2025 21:20
@dosubot dosubot bot added automated-tests area: unit tests, e2e tests, playwright routing-forms area: routing forms, routing, forms labels Jul 16, 2025
@graphite-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

graphite-app bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Add foundation team as reviewer" took an action on this PR • (07/16/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation.

"Add ready-for-e2e label" took an action on this PR • (07/16/25)

1 label was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation.

@emrysal emrysal merged commit f5f048d into add-form-identifier-to-response Jul 16, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@emrysal emrysal deleted the chore/suggestion-for-structure-routingResponseData branch July 16, 2025 21:40
emrysal added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
…tifier (#22396)

* Make identifier required

* Fallback to null if identifier isn't present

* Type fix

* Type fixes

* Type fix

* Create `RoutingFormResponseRepository`

* Create `RoutingFormResponseService`

* Use repsotiories to find form value

* Delete console.logs

* Undo change in `ZResponseInputSchema` schema

* Type fix

* Undo changes

* fix: correct import path in RoutingFormResponseService to resolve runtime errors

- Change relative import path to use @calcom alias
- Prevents import resolution failures that cause app startup issues

Co-Authored-By: joe@cal.com <j.auyeung419@gmail.com>

* Undo changes

* Update type

* Update typing

* Address feedback

* Address feedback

* chore: Provide a suggestion for pr 22396, new structure (#22491)

* chore: Provide a suggestion for pr 22396, new structure

* Refactor to create two create methods with bookingUid and id

* Use `createWithBookingUid`

* Extract routing form response parser to seperate util

* Added more and improved test cases

* Fix

---------

Co-authored-by: Joe Au-Yeung <j.auyeung419@gmail.com>

* Factory included wrong calls

* Fix test for findFieldValueByIdentifier

* Add tests

* Fix test

* Fix test

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex van Andel <me@alexvanandel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automated-tests area: unit tests, e2e tests, playwright core area: core, team members only foundation ready-for-e2e routing-forms area: routing forms, routing, forms

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants