-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 985
Permalink
Choose a base ref
{{ refName }}
default
Choose a head ref
{{ refName }}
default
Comparing changes
Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request.
If you need to, you can also or
learn more about diff comparisons.
Open a pull request
Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also .
Learn more about diff comparisons here.
base repository: bluealloy/revm
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected base ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
base: v100
Could not load branches
Nothing to show
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
{{ refName }}
default
Loading
...
head repository: bluealloy/revm
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected head ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
compare: v102
Could not load branches
Nothing to show
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
{{ refName }}
default
Loading
- 9 commits
- 34 files changed
- 7 contributors
Commits on Nov 12, 2025
-
fix: expose optional_priority_fee_check feature from context crate (#…
…3159) The feature exists in the context crate but was not exposed in revm's Cargo.toml, making it inaccessible to users.
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 1ab924b - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 1ab924bView commit details -
feat(context): add mark_cold method to JournaledAccount (#3160)
* feat(context): add mark_cold method to JournaledAccount Add a public `mark_cold()` method to `JournaledAccount` that delegates to the underlying `Account::mark_cold()`. This is analogous and provides a way to mark accounts as cold that was available in previous revm versions. This is used by celo-revm to provide backwards compatibility for the transfer precompile, which does not warm addresses in its initial implementation. * Declare mark_cold to be unsafe and add explanation. Co-authored-by: rakita <rakita@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: rakita <rakita@users.noreply.github.com>
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 9843e21 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 9843e21View commit details -
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for acdb49f - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA acdb49fView commit details
Commits on Nov 13, 2025
-
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 7299531 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 7299531View commit details -
fix(op-revm): return error when enveloped_tx is missing (#3143)
* fix(op-revm): return error when enveloped_tx is missing * fmt * Remove unnecessary clone
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 84d41bc - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 84d41bcView commit details -
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 6a5f718 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 6a5f718View commit details
Commits on Nov 14, 2025
-
fix: correctly handle selfdestruct cold load (#3174)
* fix: correctly handle selfdestruct cold load * add constantinople tests in script
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 1100ac4 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 1100ac4View commit details -
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 47d1ae2 - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 47d1ae2View commit details -
Configuration menu - View commit details
-
Copy full SHA for 0d424ba - Browse repository at this point
Copy the full SHA 0d424baView commit details
Loading
This comparison is taking too long to generate.
Unfortunately it looks like we can’t render this comparison for you right now. It might be too big, or there might be something weird with your repository.
You can try running this command locally to see the comparison on your machine:
git diff v100...v102