Skip to content

Conversation

@flack
Copy link
Contributor

@flack flack commented Dec 27, 2025

It belonged to the note removed in #33892

It belonged to the note removed in bitcoin#33892
@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Dec 27, 2025

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/34160.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

Type Reviewers
ACK instagibbs

If your review is incorrectly listed, please copy-paste <!--meta-tag:bot-skip--> into the comment that the bot should ignore.

Copy link
Member

@instagibbs instagibbs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 337b4a2

This text IIRC was directly related to the deleted rule in the prior PR #33892, and seems to be vestigial.

@fanquake fanquake merged commit 0f6a526 into bitcoin:master Dec 29, 2025
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants