[net] split PushInventory() #19322
Merged
[net] split PushInventory() #19322
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PushInventory() is currently called with a CInv object, which can be a MSG_TX or MSG_BLOCK. PushInventory() only uses the type to determine whether to add the hash to setInventoryTxToSend or vInventoryBlockToSend. Since the caller always knows what type of inventory they're pushing, the CInv is wastefully constructed and thrown away, and tx/block relay is being split out, we split the function into PushTxInventory() and PushBlockInventory().
7380bae to
f52d403
Compare
Member
|
Concept ACK |
Contributor
|
utACK f52d403. nice cleanup, this has bothered me :) |
Contributor
|
utACK f52d403 |
naumenkogs
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2020
Member
|
utACK f52d403 |
Member
|
Concept ACK, good idea |
deadalnix
pushed a commit
to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2021
Summary: ``` PushInventory() is currently called with a CInv object, which can be a MSG_TX or MSG_BLOCK. PushInventory() only uses the type to determine whether to add the hash to setInventoryTxToSend or vInventoryBlockToSend. Since the caller always knows what type of inventory they're pushing, the CInv is wastefully constructed and thrown away, and tx/block relay is being split out, we split the function into PushTxInventory() and PushBlockInventory(). ``` Backport of core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#19322 | PR19322]]. Test Plan: ninja all check-all Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D9192
zkbot
added a commit
to zcash/zcash
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2021
ZIP 239 preparations 3 Cherry-picked from the following upstream PRs: - bitcoin/bitcoin#8080 - bitcoin/bitcoin#8082 - bitcoin/bitcoin#8126 - bitcoin/bitcoin#7910 - This is the unsquashed version of bitcoin/bitcoin#8149 - We take three cleanup commits to the protocol / `CInv` code. - bitcoin/bitcoin#8822 - bitcoin/bitcoin#8880 - Excluding the first commit (we don't have the comment it fixes yet). - bitcoin/bitcoin#19322
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PushInventory() is currently called with a CInv object, which can be a
MSG_TX or MSG_BLOCK. PushInventory() only uses the type to determine
whether to add the hash to setInventoryTxToSend or
vInventoryBlockToSend.
Since the caller always knows what type of inventory they're pushing,
the CInv is wastefully constructed and thrown away, and tx/block relay
is being split out, we split the function into PushTxInventory() and
PushBlockInventory().