Skip to content

Conversation

@theStack
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up PR for #18533 -- another small step towards getting rid of the confusing "command" terminology. Also see PR #18610 which tackled the functional tests.

@theStack theStack force-pushed the 20200520-refactor-replace-command-by-msgtype-part-3 branch from 4f7b60e to 2596b43 Compare May 10, 2020 18:53
@theStack theStack force-pushed the 20200520-refactor-replace-command-by-msgtype-part-3 branch from 2596b43 to 51e9393 Compare May 10, 2020 22:21
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented May 13, 2020

ACK 51e9393

@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented May 20, 2020

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@maflcko maflcko merged commit 62948ca into bitcoin:master Jun 19, 2020
@jonatack
Copy link
Member

Concept ACK, msg_type is better

sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2020
…d CSerializedNetMsg

51e9393 refactor: s/command/msg_type/ in CNetMsgMaker and CSerializedNetMsg (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  Follow-up PR for bitcoin#18533 -- another small step towards getting rid of the confusing "command" terminology. Also see PR bitcoin#18610 which tackled the functional tests.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 51e9393

Tree-SHA512: bb6f05a7be6823d5c4eab1d05b31fee944e700946827ad9425d59a3957fd879776c88c606319cbe9832d9451b275baedf913b71429ea3e01e4e82bf2d419e819
jasonbcox pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Summary:
```
Follow-up PR for #18533 -- another small step towards getting rid of the
confusing "command" terminology. Also see PR #18610 which tackled the
functional tests.
```

Backport of core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#18937 | PR18937]].

Depends on D8460.

The change to `process_messages.cpp` is not ported as this PR is
deliberately ported out of order. The process_messages fuzzer was added
in D8376 and reverted because it caused a TSAN failure; this diff is a
dependency for the fix.

Test Plan:
  ninja all check-all

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D8462
@theStack theStack deleted the 20200520-refactor-replace-command-by-msgtype-part-3 branch December 1, 2020 10:00
maflcko pushed a commit to bitcoin-core/gui that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2022
…mand with CNetMessage::m_type

224d878 net, refactor: Drop tautological local variables (Hennadii Stepanov)
3073a99 scripted-diff: Rename CNetMessage::m_command with CNetMessage::m_type (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  bitcoin/bitcoin#18533 (comment):
  > a message is not a command, but simply a message of some type

  Continuation of bitcoin/bitcoin#18533 and bitcoin/bitcoin#18937.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Concept and code-review ACK 224d878
  shaavan:
    Code Review ACK 224d878
  w0xlt:
    crACK 224d878

Tree-SHA512: 898cafb44708dae1413fcc1533d809d75878891354f1b5edaaec1287f4921c31adc9330f4d42d82544a39689886bc17fee71ea587f9199fd5cc849d376f82176
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2022
…h CNetMessage::m_type

224d878 net, refactor: Drop tautological local variables (Hennadii Stepanov)
3073a99 scripted-diff: Rename CNetMessage::m_command with CNetMessage::m_type (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  bitcoin#18533 (comment):
  > a message is not a command, but simply a message of some type

  Continuation of bitcoin#18533 and bitcoin#18937.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Concept and code-review ACK 224d878
  shaavan:
    Code Review ACK 224d878
  w0xlt:
    crACK 224d878

Tree-SHA512: 898cafb44708dae1413fcc1533d809d75878891354f1b5edaaec1287f4921c31adc9330f4d42d82544a39689886bc17fee71ea587f9199fd5cc849d376f82176
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants