-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
refactor: s/command/msg_type/ in CNetMsgMaker and CSerializedNetMsg #18937
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
maflcko
merged 1 commit into
bitcoin:master
from
theStack:20200520-refactor-replace-command-by-msgtype-part-3
Jun 19, 2020
Merged
refactor: s/command/msg_type/ in CNetMsgMaker and CSerializedNetMsg #18937
maflcko
merged 1 commit into
bitcoin:master
from
theStack:20200520-refactor-replace-command-by-msgtype-part-3
Jun 19, 2020
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
maflcko
reviewed
May 10, 2020
4f7b60e to
2596b43
Compare
2596b43 to
51e9393
Compare
Member
|
ACK 51e9393 |
11 tasks
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
Member
|
Concept ACK, |
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2020
…d CSerializedNetMsg 51e9393 refactor: s/command/msg_type/ in CNetMsgMaker and CSerializedNetMsg (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: Follow-up PR for bitcoin#18533 -- another small step towards getting rid of the confusing "command" terminology. Also see PR bitcoin#18610 which tackled the functional tests. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 51e9393 Tree-SHA512: bb6f05a7be6823d5c4eab1d05b31fee944e700946827ad9425d59a3957fd879776c88c606319cbe9832d9451b275baedf913b71429ea3e01e4e82bf2d419e819
jasonbcox
pushed a commit
to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2020
Summary: ``` Follow-up PR for #18533 -- another small step towards getting rid of the confusing "command" terminology. Also see PR #18610 which tackled the functional tests. ``` Backport of core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#18937 | PR18937]]. Depends on D8460. The change to `process_messages.cpp` is not ported as this PR is deliberately ported out of order. The process_messages fuzzer was added in D8376 and reverted because it caused a TSAN failure; this diff is a dependency for the fix. Test Plan: ninja all check-all Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D8462
maflcko
pushed a commit
to bitcoin-core/gui
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2022
…mand with CNetMessage::m_type 224d878 net, refactor: Drop tautological local variables (Hennadii Stepanov) 3073a99 scripted-diff: Rename CNetMessage::m_command with CNetMessage::m_type (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: bitcoin/bitcoin#18533 (comment): > a message is not a command, but simply a message of some type Continuation of bitcoin/bitcoin#18533 and bitcoin/bitcoin#18937. ACKs for top commit: theStack: Concept and code-review ACK 224d878 shaavan: Code Review ACK 224d878 w0xlt: crACK 224d878 Tree-SHA512: 898cafb44708dae1413fcc1533d809d75878891354f1b5edaaec1287f4921c31adc9330f4d42d82544a39689886bc17fee71ea587f9199fd5cc849d376f82176
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2022
…h CNetMessage::m_type 224d878 net, refactor: Drop tautological local variables (Hennadii Stepanov) 3073a99 scripted-diff: Rename CNetMessage::m_command with CNetMessage::m_type (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: bitcoin#18533 (comment): > a message is not a command, but simply a message of some type Continuation of bitcoin#18533 and bitcoin#18937. ACKs for top commit: theStack: Concept and code-review ACK 224d878 shaavan: Code Review ACK 224d878 w0xlt: crACK 224d878 Tree-SHA512: 898cafb44708dae1413fcc1533d809d75878891354f1b5edaaec1287f4921c31adc9330f4d42d82544a39689886bc17fee71ea587f9199fd5cc849d376f82176
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up PR for #18533 -- another small step towards getting rid of the confusing "command" terminology. Also see PR #18610 which tackled the functional tests.