Skip to content

Conversation

@JeremyRubin
Copy link
Contributor

Because there are now 2PRs referencing this benchmark commit, we may as well add it independently as it is worth landing the benchmark even if neither patch is accepted.

#14397
#14387

@maflcko maflcko added the Tests label Oct 5, 2018
@jamesob
Copy link
Contributor

jamesob commented Oct 5, 2018

Concept ACK

@JeremyRubin JeremyRubin force-pushed the benchmark-reject-duplicate-inputs branch from 90b3b22 to e1ed29f Compare October 5, 2018 08:22
@DrahtBot
Copy link
Contributor

DrahtBot commented Oct 5, 2018

The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Conflicts

Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

@JeremyRubin JeremyRubin force-pushed the benchmark-reject-duplicate-inputs branch from e1ed29f to 7bd1165 Compare October 6, 2018 02:30
@JeremyRubin JeremyRubin force-pushed the benchmark-reject-duplicate-inputs branch 5 times, most recently from b9ee939 to bb5baab Compare November 25, 2018 00:15
@JeremyRubin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MarcoFalke rebased, clang-formatted, etc.

failure is unrelated to this PR now (one of the PBST tests)

Copy link
Member

@maflcko maflcko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Squash the fixup, so all commits compile?

@JeremyRubin JeremyRubin force-pushed the benchmark-reject-duplicate-inputs branch from bb5baab to 4a55f55 Compare November 25, 2018 01:52
@JeremyRubin JeremyRubin force-pushed the benchmark-reject-duplicate-inputs branch from 4a55f55 to e4eee7d Compare November 25, 2018 01:53
@JeremyRubin
Copy link
Contributor Author

should be ready to merge now, pending integration tests.

Thanks!

@jb55
Copy link
Contributor

jb55 commented Nov 25, 2018 via email

maflcko pushed a commit to maflcko/bitcoin-core that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2018
… case

e4eee7d Add Benchmark to test input de-duplication worst case (Jeremy Rubin)

Pull request description:

  Because there are now 2PRs referencing this benchmark commit, we may as well add it independently as it is worth landing the benchmark even if neither patch is accepted.

  bitcoin#14397
  bitcoin#14387

Tree-SHA512: 4d947323c02297b0d8f5871f9e7cc42488c0e1792a8b10dc174a25f4dd53da8146fd276949a5dbacf4083f0c6a7235cb6f21a8bc35caa499bc2508f8a048b987
@maflcko maflcko merged commit e4eee7d into bitcoin:master Nov 25, 2018
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants