-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
doc: Remove misleading checkpoints comment in CMainParams #14149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Remove misleading checkpoints comment in CMainParams #14149
Conversation
Note to reviewers: This pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
pstratem
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK checkpoints no longer consider timestamps and the strange transactions comment was always nonsensical
|
utACK fab5267. |
|
utACK fab5267 |
|
utACK fab5267 |
fab5267 doxygen: Remove misleading checkpoints comment in CMainParams (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This removes the checkpoints comment because it is misleading for two reasons: * It shows up in the doxygen documentation of `CMainParams` https://dev.visucore.com/bitcoin/doxygen/class_c_main_params.html * The comment refers to "strange transactions" in a block, which are not specified further. Transactions in blocks are always consensus-valid or rejected as consensus-invalid. Also sort the includes with `clang-format`, as the file is touched anyway. Tree-SHA512: b75f38dd0422b9310218307cbaa4dd5afa7579612d7dcdf781b8f25626f79c11e090dbcc83a05571f4418220c1a005f6254a9c461534d517ccecf7f1920be6be
…ainParams fab5267 doxygen: Remove misleading checkpoints comment in CMainParams (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This removes the checkpoints comment because it is misleading for two reasons: * It shows up in the doxygen documentation of `CMainParams` https://dev.visucore.com/bitcoin/doxygen/class_c_main_params.html * The comment refers to "strange transactions" in a block, which are not specified further. Transactions in blocks are always consensus-valid or rejected as consensus-invalid. Also sort the includes with `clang-format`, as the file is touched anyway. Tree-SHA512: b75f38dd0422b9310218307cbaa4dd5afa7579612d7dcdf781b8f25626f79c11e090dbcc83a05571f4418220c1a005f6254a9c461534d517ccecf7f1920be6be # Conflicts: # src/chainparams.cpp
…ainParams fab5267 doxygen: Remove misleading checkpoints comment in CMainParams (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: This removes the checkpoints comment because it is misleading for two reasons: * It shows up in the doxygen documentation of `CMainParams` https://dev.visucore.com/bitcoin/doxygen/class_c_main_params.html * The comment refers to "strange transactions" in a block, which are not specified further. Transactions in blocks are always consensus-valid or rejected as consensus-invalid. Also sort the includes with `clang-format`, as the file is touched anyway. Tree-SHA512: b75f38dd0422b9310218307cbaa4dd5afa7579612d7dcdf781b8f25626f79c11e090dbcc83a05571f4418220c1a005f6254a9c461534d517ccecf7f1920be6be # Conflicts: # src/chainparams.cpp
This removes the checkpoints comment because it is misleading for two reasons:
CMainParamshttps://dev.visucore.com/bitcoin/doxygen/class_c_main_params.htmlAlso sort the includes with
clang-format, as the file is touched anyway.