-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
Incoherent IntendedFor definitions #1076
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
EEGElectroencephalographyElectroencephalographyMEGMagnetoencephalographyMagnetoencephalographybugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't workingiEEG
Description
In BIDS 1.5.0,
Key name Requirement level Data type Description IntendedFor RECOMMENDED [string][] This can be an MRI/CT or a file containing the operative photo, x-ray or drawing with path relative to the project folder. If only a surface reconstruction is available, this should point to the surface reconstruction file. Note that this file should have the same coordinate system specified in iEEGCoordinateSystem. For example, T1:sub-<label>/ses-<label>/anat/sub-01_T1w.nii.gzSurface:/derivatives/surfaces/sub-<label>/ses-<label>/anat/sub-01_T1w_pial.R.surf.giiOperative photo:/sub-<label>/ses-<label>/ieeg/sub-0001_ses-01_acq-photo1_photo.jpgTalairach:/derivatives/surfaces/sub-Talairach/ses-01/anat/sub-Talairach_T1w_pial.R.surf.gii
Now:
Key name Requirement level Data type Description IntendedFor OPTIONAL string or array of strings The paths to files for which the associated file is intended to be used. Contains one or more filenames with paths relative to the participant subdirectory. Paths need to use forward slashes instead of backward slashes, regardless of operating system. If only a surface reconstruction is available, this should point to the surface reconstruction file. Note that this file should have the same coordinate system specified in iEEGCoordinateSystem. For example, T1: 'sub-/ses-/anat/sub-01_T1w.nii.gz' Surface: '/derivatives/surfaces/sub-/ses-/anat/sub-01_hemi-R_desc-T1w_pial.surf.gii' Operative photo: '/sub-/ses-/ieeg/sub-0001_ses-01_acq-photo1_photo.jpg' Talairach: '/derivatives/surfaces/sub-Talairach/ses-01/anat/sub-Talairach_hemi-R_pial.surf.gii'
So we've gone from dataset-relative to participant-relative, while the examples remain dataset relative.
Is this a known issue? Are we intending to restore the previous definition, or are iEEG (and any other BEPs that used dataset-relative) okay with the backwards incompatibility issue?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
EEGElectroencephalographyElectroencephalographyMEGMagnetoencephalographyMagnetoencephalographybugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't workingiEEG