Skip to content

Enable the archive_param_file feature by default#364

Merged
brentleyjones merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
bj/enable-the-archive_param_file-feature-by-default
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

Enable the archive_param_file feature by default#364
brentleyjones merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
bj/enable-the-archive_param_file-feature-by-default

Conversation

@brentleyjones
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@brentleyjones brentleyjones enabled auto-merge (squash) February 5, 2025 15:25
@brentleyjones brentleyjones changed the title Enable the archive_param_file feature by default Enable the archive_param_file feature by default Feb 5, 2025
@brentleyjones brentleyjones enabled auto-merge (squash) February 5, 2025 15:28
@brentleyjones brentleyjones merged commit ffa42e4 into master Feb 5, 2025
3 checks passed
@brentleyjones brentleyjones deleted the bj/enable-the-archive_param_file-feature-by-default branch February 5, 2025 15:47
features = [
# Marker features
feature(name = "archive_param_file", enabled = True),
feature(name = "archive_param_file"),
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rules_cc one is using enabled = True but this removes it, just checking that was expected

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea looks like this did the opposite of the description?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ohh, dang. Let me revert this. Not sure where the mixup came.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was a little confused because of #338

brentleyjones added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants