fix(apigatewayv2): Invalid mapping key value#9141
Merged
mergify[bot] merged 12 commits intoaws:masterfrom Jul 21, 2020
pahud:apigv2-mapping-key-fix
Merged
fix(apigatewayv2): Invalid mapping key value#9141mergify[bot] merged 12 commits intoaws:masterfrom pahud:apigv2-mapping-key-fix
mergify[bot] merged 12 commits intoaws:masterfrom
pahud:apigv2-mapping-key-fix
Conversation
ericzbeard
previously requested changes
Jul 20, 2020
Contributor
Author
|
I need update my regex pattern. WIP now. |
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @ericzbeard I am ready now. Please take a look again. |
Contributor
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Collaborator
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Contributor
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Chriscbr
pushed a commit
to Chriscbr/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2020
- `mappingKey` is now optional - undefinied `mappingKey` indicates the root base path mapping for custom domain - ensure the resource dependency for the api mapping and stage Fixes: aws#8983 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
curtiseppel
pushed a commit
to curtiseppel/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2020
- `mappingKey` is now optional - undefinied `mappingKey` indicates the root base path mapping for custom domain - ensure the resource dependency for the api mapping and stage Fixes: aws#8983 ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…6204) fix(apigatewayv2): fix api mapping key too strict issue. This PR fix the issue that Validation of apiMappingKey in ApiMappingProps is too strict. Closes: #15948 ---- # Considerations: The validation rule of the apiMappingKey was added in [PR #9141](#9141) to fix [issue #8983](#8983). However, as time changed, it looks like the validation rules have changed as well. But the validation rules are not clearly written out in AWS documentation, so I did [various validations](#15948 (comment)) in the AWS console based on the unit test, and found the rules to be very complex. Thanks to @pahud and @nija-at 's suggestions, there is no need to stand in the way between CDK users and API Gateway supporting more possibilities in the future, I just removed the validation logic and the relative unit tests. *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
hollanddd
pushed a commit
to hollanddd/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2021
…s#16204) fix(apigatewayv2): fix api mapping key too strict issue. This PR fix the issue that Validation of apiMappingKey in ApiMappingProps is too strict. Closes: aws#15948 ---- # Considerations: The validation rule of the apiMappingKey was added in [PR aws#9141](aws#9141) to fix [issue aws#8983](aws#8983). However, as time changed, it looks like the validation rules have changed as well. But the validation rules are not clearly written out in AWS documentation, so I did [various validations](aws#15948 (comment)) in the AWS console based on the unit test, and found the rules to be very complex. Thanks to @pahud and @nija-at 's suggestions, there is no need to stand in the way between CDK users and API Gateway supporting more possibilities in the future, I just removed the validation logic and the relative unit tests. *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
TikiTDO
pushed a commit
to TikiTDO/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2021
…s#16204) fix(apigatewayv2): fix api mapping key too strict issue. This PR fix the issue that Validation of apiMappingKey in ApiMappingProps is too strict. Closes: aws#15948 ---- # Considerations: The validation rule of the apiMappingKey was added in [PR aws#9141](aws#9141) to fix [issue aws#8983](aws#8983). However, as time changed, it looks like the validation rules have changed as well. But the validation rules are not clearly written out in AWS documentation, so I did [various validations](aws#15948 (comment)) in the AWS console based on the unit test, and found the rules to be very complex. Thanks to @pahud and @nija-at 's suggestions, there is no need to stand in the way between CDK users and API Gateway supporting more possibilities in the future, I just removed the validation logic and the relative unit tests. *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
david-doyle-as24
pushed a commit
to david-doyle-as24/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2021
…s#16204) fix(apigatewayv2): fix api mapping key too strict issue. This PR fix the issue that Validation of apiMappingKey in ApiMappingProps is too strict. Closes: aws#15948 ---- # Considerations: The validation rule of the apiMappingKey was added in [PR aws#9141](aws#9141) to fix [issue aws#8983](aws#8983). However, as time changed, it looks like the validation rules have changed as well. But the validation rules are not clearly written out in AWS documentation, so I did [various validations](aws#15948 (comment)) in the AWS console based on the unit test, and found the rules to be very complex. Thanks to @pahud and @nija-at 's suggestions, there is no need to stand in the way between CDK users and API Gateway supporting more possibilities in the future, I just removed the validation logic and the relative unit tests. *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
mappingKeyis now optionalmappingKeyindicates the root base path mapping for custom domainFixes: #8983
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license