Skip to content

fix(core): updatedProperties function name is misspelled#21071

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits intoaws:mainfrom
michimani:fix-typo-in-function-name
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

fix(core): updatedProperties function name is misspelled#21071
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits intoaws:mainfrom
michimani:fix-typo-in-function-name

Conversation

@michimani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR only fix typo in the name of protected function.

Properites -> Properties


All Submissions:

Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

  • This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described here

New Features

  • Have you added the new feature to an integration test?
    • Did you use yarn integ to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. yarn integ without --dry-run)?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gitpod-io bot commented Jul 9, 2022

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team July 9, 2022 14:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Jul 9, 2022
@michimani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

My apologies. Perhaps this fix affects more places than I realize?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kaizencc kaizencc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh gosh. Thanks for finding this and bringing it to our attention. I'm not sure we can do this because it is a breaking change. What we have to do is deprecate updatedProperites and introduce a new updatedProperties method that does the same thing. @michimani is this something you're interested in doing?

@michimani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@kaizencc

Thank you for confirming this.
I now have a better understanding of what needs to be done to address this issue. I am the one who found this typo and would love to address it as well as possible. May I try the fixes you have suggested? And in that case, should I recreate the PR as a separate one? I think the PR title and branch name should be changed as well.

@michimani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Excuse my repeated comments.
I will still proceed with the correction in this pull request.

@michimani michimani force-pushed the fix-typo-in-function-name branch from 4b69581 to 0ae0f26 Compare July 14, 2022 14:10
@mergify mergify bot dismissed kaizencc’s stale review July 14, 2022 14:11

Pull request has been modified.

@michimani michimani force-pushed the fix-typo-in-function-name branch from 0ae0f26 to 1c5578e Compare July 14, 2022 14:49
@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra changed the title chore(core): fix typo in function name fix(core): updatedProperties function name is misspelled Jul 14, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks for catching this!

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 14, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 4ce746e
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 7b389f0 into aws:main Jul 14, 2022
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 14, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2022
…21144)

Makes sure that we don't have two separate implementations for the same thing, so point the misspelled `updatedProperites` to the correct `updatedProperties`. See: #21071.

----

### All Submissions:

* [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies)

### New Features

* [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
guessi pushed a commit to guessi/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2022
…ws#21144)

Makes sure that we don't have two separate implementations for the same thing, so point the misspelled `updatedProperites` to the correct `updatedProperties`. See: aws#21071.

----

### All Submissions:

* [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies)

### New Features

* [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants