Skip to content

feat(stepfunctions): add fromStateMachineName to import a state machine by resource name#20036

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 14 commits intoaws:mainfrom
JulianKahnert:patch-1
Jul 18, 2022
Merged

feat(stepfunctions): add fromStateMachineName to import a state machine by resource name#20036
mergify[bot] merged 14 commits intoaws:mainfrom
JulianKahnert:patch-1

Conversation

@JulianKahnert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor


All Submissions:

Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

  • This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described here

New Features

  • Have you added the new feature to an integration test?
    • Did you use yarn integ to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. yarn integ without --dry-run)?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@gitpod-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gitpod-io bot commented Apr 22, 2022

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Apr 22, 2022
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team April 22, 2022 13:38
@JulianKahnert JulianKahnert changed the title fix minor typo in documentation StateMachine.fromStateMachineName added + minor typo in documentation Apr 22, 2022
@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra changed the title StateMachine.fromStateMachineName added + minor typo in documentation feat(stepfunctions): add fromStateMachineName to import a state machine by resource name Apr 26, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution! The addition of an API requires the addition of documentation in the README. Please see the Pull Request section of our Contributing Guide for more information.

@mergify mergify bot dismissed TheRealAmazonKendra’s stale review May 10, 2022 19:04

Pull request has been modified.

@JulianKahnert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@TheRealAmazonKendra thx for your feedback! I've added an usage example in the README. What do you think about it?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update on this. Just one quick change requested below. Also, I think we'll need an integration test for this change. The PR linter caught it after I missed requesting it last review.

@mergify mergify bot dismissed TheRealAmazonKendra’s stale review May 16, 2022 16:20

Pull request has been modified.

@TheRealAmazonKendra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm unclear on why the build is failing but we also cannot approve/merge PRs with a failing build.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2022

This PR has been in the BUILD FAILING state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra changed the base branch from v1-main to main June 13, 2022 17:41
@TheRealAmazonKendra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR got rough because of our branch change. I'm going to go ahead and help resolve some of these conflicts since they have nothing to do with your change. I'll be pushing those updates today.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that I got this back to your intended changes rather than all the extras due to changing the branch. My apologies if anything got lost from your changes, this was a bit messy to untangle. I do see why it's failing now, though.

Stack.of(this) needs to take in a construct and in this context this is a resource. Stack.of(scope) should work, though.

@TheRealAmazonKendra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED & BUILD FAILING state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

@mergify mergify bot dismissed TheRealAmazonKendra’s stale review July 13, 2022 20:18

Pull request has been modified.

@JulianKahnert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hi @TheRealAmazonKendra , sry for the late reply! I want to get this done now 🙂

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra added the pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes label Jul 14, 2022
@JulianKahnert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @TheRealAmazonKendra is there anything else you want me to do? 😊

@TheRealAmazonKendra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JulianKahnert See my note about the incorrect name of the test. That should be all, I think.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TheRealAmazonKendra TheRealAmazonKendra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for all your work on this!

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 23f5711
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 2b5bd59 into aws:main Jul 18, 2022
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@JulianKahnert JulianKahnert deleted the patch-1 branch July 18, 2022 21:57
comcalvi pushed a commit to comcalvi/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
…hine by resource name (aws#20036)

----

### All Submissions:

* [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)

### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:

* [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies)

### New Features

* [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)?
	* [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)?

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

p2 pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants