TST: Replace test with conf in test_find_mod_objs()#17873
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Astropy! 🌌 This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainers who will review this pull request of some common things to look for.
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Co-authored-by: Mridul Seth <mail@mriduls.com> Co-authored-by: Marten van Kerkwijk <mhvk@astro.utoronto.ca>
8380392 to
a02d0f4
Compare
mhvk
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2025
mhvk
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I think this is indeed uncontroversial!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request is to apply diff to
astropy/utils/tests/test_introspection.pyfrom #16208 and also apply comment from https://github.com/astropy/astropy/pull/16208/files#r1745565811 . This is a precursor for #16177 so it is one less thing we worry about when we deprecate the test runner. Should be uncontroversial but backport is also probably unnecessary.