Closed
Conversation
63d56d6 to
b3f5bba
Compare
Member
Author
|
Here we structure applicability as two enumerations
We could also consider a flat structure
or a structure that more closely matches when it is applicable / safe
(implemented in #7821) |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #7819 will degrade performances by 3.35%Comparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
b3f5bba to
c5ae2f1
Compare
Contributor
PR Check ResultsEcosystem✅ ecosystem check detected no changes. |
Member
Author
|
Closing in favor of #7821 |
zanieb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
Following much discussion for #4181 at #5119, #5476, #7769, #7819, and in [Discord](https://discord.com/channels/1039017663004942429/1082324250112823306/1159144114231709746), this pull request changes `Applicability` from using `Automatic`, `Suggested`, and `Manual` to `Always`, `Sometimes`, and `Never`. Also removes `Applicability::Unspecified` (replacing #7792).
zanieb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2023
After working with the previous change in #7821 I found the names a bit unclear and their relationship with the user-facing API muddied. Since the applicability is exposed to the user directly in our JSON output, I think it's important that these names align with our configuration options. I've replaced `Manual` or `Never` with `Display` which captures our intent for these fixes (only for display). Here, we create room for future levels, such as `HasPlaceholders`, which wouldn't fit into the `Always`/`Sometimes`/`Never` levels. Unlike #7819, this retains the flat enum structure which is easier to work with.
konstin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
Following much discussion for #4181 at #5119, #5476, #7769, #7819, and in [Discord](https://discord.com/channels/1039017663004942429/1082324250112823306/1159144114231709746), this pull request changes `Applicability` from using `Automatic`, `Suggested`, and `Manual` to `Always`, `Sometimes`, and `Never`. Also removes `Applicability::Unspecified` (replacing #7792).
konstin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2023
After working with the previous change in #7821 I found the names a bit unclear and their relationship with the user-facing API muddied. Since the applicability is exposed to the user directly in our JSON output, I think it's important that these names align with our configuration options. I've replaced `Manual` or `Never` with `Display` which captures our intent for these fixes (only for display). Here, we create room for future levels, such as `HasPlaceholders`, which wouldn't fit into the `Always`/`Sometimes`/`Never` levels. Unlike #7819, this retains the flat enum structure which is easier to work with.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following much discussion for #4181 at #5119, #5476, #7769, and in Discord, this pull request changes
Applicabilityfrom usingSuggestedfor uncertain fixes toUnsafe.Also removes
Applicability::Unspecified(replacing #7792).I have some qualms about how we will explain "manual" fixes to users which are a type of unsafe fix that cannot be applied programmatically. However, since manual fixes are not presented to the user after #7769 we can worry about this in the future.