Closed
Conversation
This was referenced Jul 10, 2023
Member
Author
|
Current dependencies on/for this PR: This comment was auto-generated by Graphite. |
738e9a9 to
2c04bdc
Compare
42ada26 to
32813bd
Compare
Contributor
PR Check ResultsEcosystem✅ ecosystem check detected no changes. BenchmarkLinuxWindows |
2c04bdc to
0681c5e
Compare
32813bd to
9cc7c21
Compare
konstin
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2023
0681c5e to
c895628
Compare
9cc7c21 to
f3444d0
Compare
c895628 to
553008e
Compare
Base automatically changed from
pass-format-context-to-needs-parentheses
to
main
July 11, 2023 12:28
f3444d0 to
71a59d1
Compare
Member
Author
|
Closing for now as it isn't needed right way. We can reconsider adding |
This was referenced Aug 16, 2023
charliermarsh
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Summary
Same as for the previous PR. I assumed that I would need to match on all
Exprand this isn't easily possible withAnyNodeRef.That's why I introduced a new
ExpressionRefwhich is the unowned pendant toExpr. There are a few cases where it allows me to remove some debug assertions, but I didn't end up using it heavily.We can merge it if you find it useful, or leave it as is.
Test Plan
It compiles