Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Current dependencies on/for this PR:
This comment was auto-generated by Graphite. |
Closed
2aa2c90 to
1d37faf
Compare
1d37faf to
f809554
Compare
f809554 to
895d416
Compare
Contributor
PR Check ResultsEcosystem✅ ecosystem check detected no changes. BenchmarkLinuxWindows |
konstin
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
895d416 to
54b2b11
Compare
Member
Author
|
@MichaReiser merged this pull request with Graphite. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Summary
This PR adds basic formatting for compare operations.
The implementation currently breaks diffeently when nesting binary like expressions. I haven't yet figured out what Black's logic is in that case but I think that this by itself is already an improvement worth merging.
Test Plan
I added a few new tests