[`ruff`] New rule float-comparison (`RUF069`) by chirizxc · Pull Request #20585 · astral-sh/ruff

chirizxc · 2025-09-25T21:12:22Z

Summary

Part of #14220

Test Plan

cargo nextest run ruf069

chirizxc · 2025-09-25T21:14:55Z

We need more tests and cases where the rule can give FP and so on

chirizxc · 2025-09-25T21:16:44Z

Also, I randomly picked CODE for this rule

ntBre · 2025-09-25T21:26:00Z

I haven't reviewed, but if there's not a corresponding E723 rule in pycodestyle, I would default to making this a ruff rule. We have a PR in progress for RUF066, so RUF067 would be the next free code.

github-actions · 2025-09-25T21:26:34Z

`ruff-ecosystem` results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+1130 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 15 projects; 40 projects unchanged)

RasaHQ/rasa (+35 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview

+ .github/tests/test_mr_publish_results.py:63:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `87.0 == transform_to_seconds("1m27s")`
+ .github/tests/test_mr_publish_results.py:64:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `87.3 == transform_to_seconds("1m27.3s")`
+ .github/tests/test_mr_publish_results.py:65:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `27.0 == transform_to_seconds("27s")`
+ .github/tests/test_mr_publish_results.py:66:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `3627.0 == transform_to_seconds("1h27s")`
+ .github/tests/test_mr_publish_results.py:67:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `3687.0 == transform_to_seconds("1h1m27s")`
+ rasa/core/policies/ensemble.py:57:32: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `max_confidence == 0.0`
+ rasa/engine/caching.py:301:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `self._max_cache_size == 0.0`
+ rasa/shared/core/slots.py:257:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `x == 1.0`
+ rasa/shared/core/slots.py:260:20: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `float(x) == 1.0`
+ rasa/utils/tensorflow/layers.py:291:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `self.density == 1.0`
... 25 additional changes omitted for project

apache/airflow (+31 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

+ airflow-core/src/airflow/models/taskinstance.py:958:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `multiplier != 1.0`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/api_fastapi/execution_api/versions/head/test_task_instances.py:1369:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `ti.duration == 3600.00`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/cli/commands/test_variable_command.py:205:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `Variable.get("float", deserialize_json=True) == 42.0`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/core/test_configuration.py:376:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `test_conf.getfloat("another", "key8_float", fallback="1") == 1.0`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/jobs/test_base_job.py:113:20: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `most_recent.heartrate == float(job_heartbeat_sec)`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/jobs/test_base_job.py:298:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `health_check_threshold("UnknownJob", 30) == 30 * 2.1`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py:7067:24: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `duration == 0.0`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/jobs/test_scheduler_job.py:7093:24: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `duration == 0.0`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/serialization/test_dag_serialization.py:4193:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result["retry_delay"] == 300.0`
+ airflow-core/tests/unit/utils/test_sqlalchemy.py:119:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `logical_date.utcoffset().total_seconds() == 0.0`
... 21 additional changes omitted for project

apache/superset (+31 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

+ tests/integration_tests/utils_tests.py:406:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `cast_to_num("5.2") == 5.2`
+ tests/integration_tests/utils_tests.py:408:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `cast_to_num(10.1) == 10.1`
+ tests/unit_tests/commands/databases/csv_reader_test.py:853:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `df.iloc[0]["Score"] == 95.5`
+ tests/unit_tests/commands/databases/csv_reader_test.py:950:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result_df.iloc[0]["score"] == 95.5`
+ tests/unit_tests/commands/report/alert_test.py:226:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `command._result == 0.0`
+ tests/unit_tests/commands/report/alert_test.py:229:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `report_schedule_mock.last_value == 0.0`
+ tests/unit_tests/dataframe_test.py:264:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `records[3]["result"] == 0.0`
+ tests/unit_tests/dataframe_test.py:265:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `records[4]["result"] == 42.5`
+ tests/unit_tests/dataframe_test.py:308:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `records_without_fix[1]["test"] == 5.0`
+ tests/unit_tests/dataframe_test.py:358:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `parsed[0]["value1"] == 100.0`
... 21 additional changes omitted for project

bokeh/bokeh (+197 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview --select ALL

+ examples/topics/categorical/slope_graph.py:29:10: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `df["year"] == 2000.0`
+ examples/topics/categorical/slope_graph.py:29:35: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `df["year"] == 2010.0`
+ src/bokeh/colors/color.py:321:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `self.a == 1.0`
+ src/bokeh/colors/color.py:460:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `self.a == 1.0`
+ tests/integration/tools/test_range_tool.py:103:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `results['start'] == 0.4`
+ tests/integration/tools/test_range_tool.py:104:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `results['end'] == 0.6`
+ tests/integration/tools/test_range_tool.py:118:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `results['start'] == 0.5`
+ tests/integration/tools/test_range_tool.py:119:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `results['end'] == 0.7`
+ tests/integration/tools/test_range_tool.py:126:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `results['start'] == 0.2`
+ tests/integration/tools/test_range_tool.py:127:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `results['end'] == 0.4`
... 187 additional changes omitted for project

ibis-project/ibis (+29 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview

+ ibis/backends/bigquery/tests/system/test_client.py:438:48: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `t.max != 9999.9`
+ ibis/backends/bigquery/tests/system/udf/test_udf_execute.py:102:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `con.execute(expr) == 8.0`
+ ibis/backends/clickhouse/tests/test_operators.py:175:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `round(con.execute(expr), 3) == -5.245`
+ ibis/backends/druid/tests/conftest.py:58:31: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `js[datasource] == 100.0`
+ ibis/backends/duckdb/tests/test_udf.py:180:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result.iat[0] == 1.0`
+ ibis/backends/materialize/tests/test_client.py:318:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `value[0].as_py() == 1.0`
+ ibis/backends/postgres/tests/test_client.py:515:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `value[0].as_py() == 1.0`
+ ibis/backends/sqlite/tests/test_client.py:56:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result == 0.0`
+ ibis/backends/tests/test_map.py:504:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `con.execute(expr) == 3.0`
+ ibis/backends/tests/test_numeric.py:1217:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result == 0.5`
... 19 additional changes omitted for project

langchain-ai/langchain (+71 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview

+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/language_models/chat_models/test_base.py:1207:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `ls_params["ls_temperature"] == 0.2`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/language_models/llms/test_base.py:273:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `ls_params["ls_temperature"] == 0.2`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:1150:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result_v2[0].coordinates.latitude == 48.8584`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:1151:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result_v2[0].coordinates.longitude == 2.2945`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:1190:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result_mixed[1].coordinates.latitude == 37.8199`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:1246:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result_v1_full[0].price == 999.99`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/output_parsers/test_openai_tools.py:1268:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result_v1_minimal[0].price == 29.99`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/rate_limiters/test_in_memory_rate_limiter.py:104:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `rate_limiter.available_tokens == 199.0`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/rate_limiters/test_in_memory_rate_limiter.py:107:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `rate_limiter.available_tokens == 499.0`
+ libs/core/tests/unit_tests/rate_limiters/test_in_memory_rate_limiter.py:21:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `rate_limiter.available_tokens == 0.0`
... 61 additional changes omitted for project

lnbits/lnbits (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview

+ tests/unit/test_services_fees.py:61:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `fee / 1000 == 199`

milvus-io/pymilvus (+17 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)

ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --no-fix --output-format concise --preview

+ examples/orm_deprecated/bulk_import/example_bulkwriter_with_nullable.py:300:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `len(b[0]) == DIM/8`
+ pymilvus/orm/iterator.py:557:12: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `self._width == 0.0`
+ tests/orm/test_utility.py:346:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result == 0.0`
+ tests/orm/test_utility.py:355:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `result == 1000.0`
+ tests/test_client_types.py:831:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `extra["cache_hit_ratio"] == 0.75`
+ tests/test_search_result.py:1195:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `val == 1.0`
+ tests/test_search_result.py:1203:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `extract_struct_field_value(fd, 0) == 1.0`
+ tests/test_search_result.py:1348:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `info.last_bound == 0.0`
+ tests/test_search_result.py:154:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `first_hit["distance"] == 0.0`
+ tests/test_search_result.py:681:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `sr.extra["cache_hit_ratio"] == 0.5`
... 7 additional changes omitted for project

... Truncated remaining completed project reports due to GitHub comment length restrictions

Changes by rule (1 rules affected)

code	total	+ violation	- violation	+ fix	- fix
RUF069	1130	1130	0	0	0

chirizxc · 2025-09-25T23:13:28Z

examples/topics/categorical/slope_graph.py:29:10: RUF067 Comparison df["year"] == 2000.0 should be replaced by math.isclose(df["year"], 2000.0, rel_tol=1e-09, abs_tol=1e-09)
examples/topics/categorical/slope_graph.py:29:35: RUF067 Comparison df["year"] == 2010.0 should be replaced by math.isclose(df["year"], 2010.0, rel_tol=1e-09, abs_tol=1e-09)

This breaks the behavior of code and results in:

TypeError: cannot convert the series to <class 'float'>

chirizxc · 2025-09-25T23:16:42Z

What should we do in such a case? Should we somehow mark this fact in the documentation or what should we do, because we will not be able to check in general that such calls will not lead to some code breakages

chirizxc · 2025-09-26T18:43:16Z

The rule detects potentially problematic float comparisons correctly, but we should not suggest replacing only math.isclose() but also numpy.isclose()

ntBre · 2025-10-27T18:44:41Z

Would it help with the false positives, and maybe with the numpy cases, to apply the rule only in boolean contexts? I think we have other rules that apply only to expressions used as if conditions or in negated not expressions, for example. We even have a semantic model helper for it:

ruff/crates/ruff_python_semantic/src/model.rs

Line 1974 in 5f136c2

pub const fn in_boolean_test(&self) -> bool {

This rule is going to require type inference to get exactly right anyway, so this might be a good way to be more conservative in the meantime.

I also only gave the implementation a quick skim and could have overlooked this, but does this rule apply to comparisons like <= and > too? I would probably expect those to be allowed since something like delta < 1e-8 should work as expected, I'm assuming that's what math.isclose does under the hood. Along those lines, we may want to rename the rule to float-equality-comparison, if it only applies to equality.

chirizxc · 2025-10-29T08:54:34Z

Would it help with the false positives, and maybe with the numpy cases, to apply the rule only in boolean contexts? I think we have other rules that apply only to expressions used as if conditions or in negated not expressions, for example. We even have a semantic model helper for it:

ruff/crates/ruff_python_semantic/src/model.rs

Line 1974 in 5f136c2

pub const fn in_boolean_test(&self) -> bool {

This rule is going to require type inference to get exactly right anyway, so this might be a good way to be more conservative in the meantime.

I also only gave the implementation a quick skim and could have overlooked this, but does this rule apply to comparisons like <= and > too? I would probably expect those to be allowed since something like delta < 1e-8 should work as expected, I'm assuming that's what math.isclose does under the hood. Along those lines, we may want to rename the rule to float-equality-comparison, if it only applies to equality.

Yes, this only applies to == and !=, just as it works in SonarQube.

ntBre

Thank you! And sorry for the delay on the review.

I think this will be a really helpful rule, but I'm a bit wary of recommending np.isclose. What do you think about trying to restrict the rule to plain floats for now? We could always expand the scope later.

My other comments were just small suggestions.

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs

crates/ruff_linter/src/codes.rs

chirizxc · 2026-01-01T17:40:12Z

Thank you! And sorry for the delay on the review.

I think this will be a really helpful rule, but I'm a bit wary of recommending np.isclose. What do you think about trying to restrict the rule to plain floats for now? We could always expand the scope later.

My other comments were just small suggestions.

Then we will severely restrict the rule, since comparing two floats is less common

chirizxc · 2026-01-01T17:41:05Z

~~Essentially, math.isclose() / numpy.isclose() should cover 100% of cases.~~

chirizxc · 2026-01-24T19:30:19Z

I also slightly updated the code to find the following cases:

def foo(a, b):
    return a == b - 0.1

def foo(a, b):
    return a == b - float(“2”)

Ecosystem report should become larger (upd. 1008 -> 1148)

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs

ntBre

Thanks! I found a couple more very small nits in the code, and I also found some interesting cases in the ecosystem report:

tests/integration/tools/test_box_zoom_tool.py:106:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison (results['xrstart'] + results['xrend'])/2.0 == pytest.approx(0.25)
tests/integration/tools/test_box_zoom_tool.py:107:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison (results['yrstart'] + results['yrend'])/2.0 == pytest.approx(0.75)

I think these are technically false positives because pytest.approx is another way to solve the approximate equality issue.

airflow-core/tests/unit/models/test_pool.py:205:16: RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison float("inf") == pool.open_slots()

If I understand correctly, this is actually a safe comparison because two infinities can be equal, unlike NaNs.

I think we should try to suppress these two cases before landing.

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs

crates/ruff_linter/src/codes.rs

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs

…son.rs Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

…son.rs Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

chirizxc · 2026-01-26T20:25:30Z

Thanks! I found a couple more very small nits in the code, and I also found some interesting cases in the ecosystem report:
* [tests/integration/tools/test_box_zoom_tool.py:106:16:](https://github.com/bokeh/bokeh/blob/829b2a75c402d0d0abd7e37ff201fbdfd949d857/tests/integration/tools/test_box_zoom_tool.py#L106) RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `(results['xrstart'] + results['xrend'])/2.0 == pytest.approx(0.25)`

* [tests/integration/tools/test_box_zoom_tool.py:107:16:](https://github.com/bokeh/bokeh/blob/829b2a75c402d0d0abd7e37ff201fbdfd949d857/tests/integration/tools/test_box_zoom_tool.py#L107) RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `(results['yrstart'] + results['yrend'])/2.0 == pytest.approx(0.75)`
I think these are technically false positives because pytest.approx is another way to solve the approximate equality issue.
* [airflow-core/tests/unit/models/test_pool.py:205:16:](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/0cf89fa362e72898b718fe6ff2fc8caa0b4ba45f/airflow-core/tests/unit/models/test_pool.py#L205) RUF069 Unreliable floating point equality comparison `float("inf") == pool.open_slots()`
If I understand correctly, this is actually a safe comparison because two infinities can be equal, unlike NaNs.

I think we should try to suppress these two cases before landing.

It seems that everything should be fine now.

ntBre

Thanks for your patience and all of your work here. I think I found one more issue with math.inf, but this otherwise looks great to me.

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs

ntBre

Thank you! I pushed two commits slightly simplifying the math.inf checks (resolve_qualified_name already handles both names and attributes) and adding a test case for complex("inf"). I think this is ready to land!

## Summary See: #20585 ## Test Plan `cargo nextest run ruf069`

ntBre added rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule preview Related to preview mode features labels Sep 25, 2025

chirizxc changed the title ~~[pycodestyle] New rule float-comparison (E723)~~ [ruff] New rule float-comparison (RUF067) Sep 25, 2025

fix

57dd653

chirizxc force-pushed the sq-S1244 branch from 1d92d66 to 57dd653 Compare October 24, 2025 12:57

chirizxc added 3 commits October 24, 2025 16:02

update snapshots

6ae970e

update snapshots

de6b234

more tests

7a75547

float_comparison -> float-equality-comparison

71f9dee

ntBre mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2025

[ruff] Implement union-with-annotated-type (RUF066) #21079

Closed

ntBre mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2025

Add rule to detect unnecessary class properties #21535

Merged

leandrobbraga mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2025

[ruff] Detect duplicate entries in __all__ (RUF068) #22114

Merged

Merge branch 'main' into sq-S1244

649b2eb

ntBre reviewed Jan 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

update

80318f0

chirizxc changed the title ~~[ruff] New rule float-comparison (RUF067)~~ [ruff] New rule float-comparison (RUF070) Jan 1, 2026

chirizxc added 3 commits January 1, 2026 21:11

update

4cfd8be

update schema

1bed4b4

Merge branch 'main' into sq-S1244

203faf8

chirizxc added 2 commits January 24, 2026 22:28

fmt

956dca9

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/sq-S1244' into sq-S1244

5407031

add snapshots

cf9fbd1

dscorbett reviewed Jan 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

chirizxc added 2 commits January 25, 2026 14:25

complex numbers

45d50ec

fix false negative

5706ae3

ntBre reviewed Jan 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

chirizxc and others added 6 commits January 26, 2026 22:34

Update crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_compari…

a789145

…son.rs Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

Update crates/ruff_linter/src/codes.rs

1012272

Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

Update crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_compari…

b068b27

…son.rs Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>

fix ci

b0160a6

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/sq-S1244' into sq-S1244

38472d0

fix false positives

9f4aae5

ntBre reviewed Feb 4, 2026

View reviewed changes

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

dscorbett reviewed Feb 4, 2026

View reviewed changes

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/float_equality_comparison.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

chirizxc added 2 commits February 5, 2026 01:30

update

27f20c6

update

73ab884

chirizxc requested a review from ntBre February 4, 2026 22:50

chirizxc and others added 4 commits February 5, 2026 01:51

fix clippy

7f5618f

update comments

cb58950

simplify inf check

8efba7f

add complex(inf) test

d736145

ntBre approved these changes Feb 5, 2026

View reviewed changes

ntBre merged commit d70f33c into astral-sh:main Feb 5, 2026
42 checks passed

chirizxc deleted the sq-S1244 branch February 5, 2026 19:57

chirizxc mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2026

[ruff] Ignore std cmath.inf (RUF069) #23120

Merged

ntBre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026

[ruff] Ignore std cmath.inf (RUF069) (#23120)

5a5d3b0

## Summary See: #20585 ## Test Plan `cargo nextest run ruf069`

BrewTestBot mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2026

ruff 0.15.1 Homebrew/homebrew-core#267345

Merged

Conversation

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Test Plan

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

ntBre commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited by astral-sh-bot bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

Linter (preview)

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Sep 26, 2025

Uh oh!

ntBre commented Oct 27, 2025

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Oct 29, 2025

Uh oh!

ntBre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Jan 1, 2026

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Jan 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Jan 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ntBre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chirizxc commented Jan 26, 2026

Uh oh!

ntBre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ntBre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited by astral-sh-bot bot

Loading

`ruff-ecosystem` results

chirizxc commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

chirizxc commented Jan 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chirizxc commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading