Skip to content

[refurb] Avoid triggering hardcoded-string-charset for reordered sets#14233

Merged
charliermarsh merged 1 commit intomainfrom
charlie/f
Nov 9, 2024
Merged

[refurb] Avoid triggering hardcoded-string-charset for reordered sets#14233
charliermarsh merged 1 commit intomainfrom
charlie/f

Conversation

@charliermarsh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

It's only safe to enforce the x in "1234567890" case if x is exactly one character, since the set on the right has been reordered as compared to string.digits. We can't know if x is exactly one character unless it's a literal. And if it's a literal, well, it's kind of silly code in the first place?

Closes #13802.

@charliermarsh charliermarsh self-assigned this Nov 9, 2024
@charliermarsh charliermarsh added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 9, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2024

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit 555a5c9 into main Nov 9, 2024
@charliermarsh charliermarsh deleted the charlie/f branch November 9, 2024 20:31
ntBre added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
Summary
--

This code has been unused since #14233 but not detected by clippy I guess. This
should help to remove the temptation to use the set comparison again like I
suggested in #21144. And we shouldn't do the set comparison because of #13802,
which #14233 fixed.

Test Plan
--

Existing tests
ntBre added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Summary
--

This code has been unused since #14233 but not detected by clippy I
guess. This should help to remove the temptation to use the set
comparison again like I suggested in #21144. And we shouldn't do the set
comparison because of #13802, which #14233 fixed.

Test Plan
--

Existing tests
ibraheemdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Summary
--

This code has been unused since #14233 but not detected by clippy I
guess. This should help to remove the temptation to use the set
comparison again like I suggested in #21144. And we shouldn't do the set
comparison because of #13802, which #14233 fixed.

Test Plan
--

Existing tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FURB156 false positive for multi-character string before in

1 participant