Add predicate descriptions overloads to anyMatch and noneMatch
#3639
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Spotted the build was failing. Might be handy to have a bullet point to say "run |
Member
|
Hi @jh-instant, thanks a lot for raising the PR! I'm sorry it might take a bit longer before we can review the changes. If you participate in Hacktoberfest, I will label the PR as accepted so that it is properly counted. |
Contributor
Author
|
No problem - take your time. Looks like I needed to rebase to fix this test:
I guess the workflows will need running again, sorry! |
Member
|
Integrated thanks @jh-instant! |
anyMatch and noneMatch
nosan
pushed a commit
to nosan/assertj
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Check List:
anyMatchandnoneMatch#3638Hopefully fairly self explanatory. Happy to make any necessary changes. Not sure how to calculate the
@sincefield on the Javadoc, so took a guess at the next minor version.