Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)"#14844
Conversation
apache#14702)" This reverts commit cf937c6.
|
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
|
Don't know if you're subscribed - Tests are randomized - sometimes a different reshuffle of components may not succeed after a patch. Here's an example: I haven't tried if it reproduces or not - I'm very limited today - seems like the builds have gone back to normal after I reverted the patch though, so something is not right? |
|
Yes, that's caused by this PR... It reproduces, but only intermittently... |
|
I get a high failure ratio with this: |
|
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
...t-framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/tests/codecs/asserting/AssertingKnnVectorsFormat.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the dev@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you for your contribution! |
|
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
msokolov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I'm still kind of wary about the multiple abstractions: what impact will the hint actually have? I guess it depends on how the Directory chooses to interpret it? But this seems like progress!
Reapply #14702