[fix](hudi) Fix Hudi query error "do not support DLA type HUDI" #58413
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
morningman
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2025
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 35116 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 184341 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.58 s |
Contributor
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
Contributor
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
englefly
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2025
Contributor
|
run cloud_p0 |
16 tasks
morrySnow
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2025
…te fail because of invalid slot (#58643) ### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: #57558 #58413 Problem Summary: This fix addresses the following three issues: 1. When invoking the method org.apache.doris.nereids.trees.plans.logical.LogicalHudiScan#withRelationId, the output needs to be recalculated to meet expectations. 2. After compensating with a union all due to partial partition invalidation of a materialized view, during the next round of transparent rewriting, the rewriting for the child of the union allshould use the query partitioncorresponding to the specific relation id to prevent infinite loops. 3. Currently, in the `test_hudi_rewrite_mtmv` test, if the plan rewritten by the materialized view transparent rewriting is not selected by the CBO, it is difficult to troubleshoot because explain memo planis not used. Therefore, the corresponding test method is modified.
seawinde
added a commit
to seawinde/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2025
…te fail because of invalid slot (apache#58643) Related PR: apache#57558 apache#58413 Problem Summary: This fix addresses the following three issues: 1. When invoking the method org.apache.doris.nereids.trees.plans.logical.LogicalHudiScan#withRelationId, the output needs to be recalculated to meet expectations. 2. After compensating with a union all due to partial partition invalidation of a materialized view, during the next round of transparent rewriting, the rewriting for the child of the union allshould use the query partitioncorresponding to the specific relation id to prevent infinite loops. 3. Currently, in the `test_hudi_rewrite_mtmv` test, if the plan rewritten by the materialized view transparent rewriting is not selected by the CBO, it is difficult to troubleshoot because explain memo planis not used. Therefore, the corresponding test method is modified.
seawinde
added a commit
to seawinde/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2025
…te fail because of invalid slot (apache#58643) Related PR: apache#57558 apache#58413 Problem Summary: This fix addresses the following three issues: 1. When invoking the method org.apache.doris.nereids.trees.plans.logical.LogicalHudiScan#withRelationId, the output needs to be recalculated to meet expectations. 2. After compensating with a union all due to partial partition invalidation of a materialized view, during the next round of transparent rewriting, the rewriting for the child of the union allshould use the query partitioncorresponding to the specific relation id to prevent infinite loops. 3. Currently, in the `test_hudi_rewrite_mtmv` test, if the plan rewritten by the materialized view transparent rewriting is not selected by the CBO, it is difficult to troubleshoot because explain memo planis not used. Therefore, the corresponding test method is modified.
nagisa-kunhah
pushed a commit
to nagisa-kunhah/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2025
…he#58413) ### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: apache#56802 Problem Summary: `LogicalHudiScan` did not override `withTableAlias()` and `withCachedOutput()` methods, causing HUDI table type information to be lost during optimization, and the table was incorrectly processed as `PhysicalFileScan`.
nagisa-kunhah
pushed a commit
to nagisa-kunhah/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2025
…te fail because of invalid slot (apache#58643) ### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: apache#57558 apache#58413 Problem Summary: This fix addresses the following three issues: 1. When invoking the method org.apache.doris.nereids.trees.plans.logical.LogicalHudiScan#withRelationId, the output needs to be recalculated to meet expectations. 2. After compensating with a union all due to partial partition invalidation of a materialized view, during the next round of transparent rewriting, the rewriting for the child of the union allshould use the query partitioncorresponding to the specific relation id to prevent infinite loops. 3. Currently, in the `test_hudi_rewrite_mtmv` test, if the plan rewritten by the materialized view transparent rewriting is not selected by the CBO, it is difficult to troubleshoot because explain memo planis not used. Therefore, the corresponding test method is modified.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Related PR: #56802
Problem Summary:
LogicalHudiScandid not overridewithTableAlias()andwithCachedOutput()methods, causing HUDI table type information to be lost during optimization, and the table was incorrectly processed asPhysicalFileScan.Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)