Skip to content

branch-3.1: [opt](recycler) Add concurrency recycle for tmp rowset #52677 #56573

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
morrySnow merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2025
Merged

branch-3.1: [opt](recycler) Add concurrency recycle for tmp rowset #52677 #56573

morrySnow merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2025

Conversation

@wyxxxcat
Copy link
Contributor

@wyxxxcat wyxxxcat commented Sep 28, 2025

pick: #52677

@wyxxxcat
[opt](recycler) Add concurrency recycle for tmp rowset (apache#52677)
610d0ea 
after pr

| Concurrency | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 |
|-------------|---------|---------|---------|
| 1           | 38973   | 36734   | 34172   |
| 5           | 20714   | 20136   | 22548   |
| 10          | 14780   | 15022   | 15851   |
@wyxxxcat wyxxxcat requested a review from morrySnow as a code owner September 28, 2025 10:09
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Sep 28, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@wyxxxcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyxxxcat commented Sep 28, 2025

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

doris-robot commented Sep 28, 2025

Cloud UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (27/27) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 82.35% (1236/1501)
Line Coverage 66.24% (22297/33663)
Region Coverage 67.68% (11173/16508)
Branch Coverage 57.30% (5908/10310)

@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit 8726a0e into apache:branch-3.1 Sep 29, 2025
23 checks passed
@morrySnow morrySnow mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@morrySnow morrySnow morrySnow approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wyxxxcat @hello-stephen @doris-robot @morrySnow