Skip to content

Conversation

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor

@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt commented Nov 1, 2024

In ##41667 we support ignore filter partitial, however, when sync_filter_size is turned off, the final filter may only contain part of the data because some filters are judged to be 'in'.
For example:
there are rf001(2 instances, in_or_bloom),rf000(2 instances, min_max),
instance_1 has 1e8 row and rf001 change to bloom, the rf000 will not ignored
instance_2 has 1 row and rf001 change to in, the rf000 will ignored
finally, rf000 applied and make wrong result

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions github-actions bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed labels Nov 4, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt merged commit 65a8166 into apache:master Nov 4, 2024
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
)

In ##41667 we support ignore filter
partitial, however, when sync_filter_size is turned off, the final
filter may only contain part of the data because some filters are judged
to be 'in'.
For example:
there are rf001(2 instances, in_or_bloom),rf000(2 instances, min_max),
instance_1 has 1e8 row and rf001 change to bloom, the rf000 will not
ignored
instance_2 has 1 row and rf001 change to in, the rf000 will ignored
finally, rf000 applied and make wrong result
dataroaring pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
… filter (#43195)

Cherry-picked from #43078

Co-authored-by: Pxl <pxl290@qq.com>
BiteTheDDDDt added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
)

In ##41667 we support ignore filter
partitial, however, when sync_filter_size is turned off, the final
filter may only contain part of the data because some filters are judged
to be 'in'.
For example:
there are rf001(2 instances, in_or_bloom),rf000(2 instances, min_max),
instance_1 has 1e8 row and rf001 change to bloom, the rf000 will not
ignored
instance_2 has 1 row and rf001 change to in, the rf000 will ignored
finally, rf000 applied and make wrong result
BiteTheDDDDt added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
@wm1581066 wm1581066 added the usercase Important user case type label label Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.1.8-merged dev/3.0.3-merged reviewed usercase Important user case type label

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants