VR: consider NICs for remote access VPN when apply dhcp entry#11681
VR: consider NICs for remote access VPN when apply dhcp entry#11681DaanHoogland merged 1 commit intoapache:4.20from
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #11681 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 16.17% 16.17%
Complexity 13297 13297
=========================================
Files 5656 5656
Lines 498151 498151
Branches 60441 60441
=========================================
+ Hits 80588 80590 +2
+ Misses 408591 408589 -2
Partials 8972 8972
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 15083 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15104 |
|
@blueorangutan test keepEnv |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14397)
|
Description
This PR fixes #11677
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?