kvm: fix vm deployment with direct-download iso#11532
kvm: fix vm deployment with direct-download iso#11532DaanHoogland merged 1 commit intoapache:4.20from
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Fixes apache#11521 QCOW2 file check is not needed when the image format is ISO Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
698a705 to
47c8042
Compare
|
@weizhouapache thanks for the review. I'm restarting packaging as I changed the order of conditions @blueorangutan package |
|
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #11532 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 16.16% 4.00% -12.16%
=============================================
Files 5656 402 -5254
Lines 497884 32625 -465259
Branches 60378 5796 -54582
=============================================
- Hits 80463 1308 -79155
+ Misses 408466 31167 -377299
+ Partials 8955 150 -8805
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 14764 |
|
lgtm, tested |
|
good, thanks @sudo87 @blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14772 |
Description
Fixes #11521
QCOW2 file check is not needed when the image format is ISO
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?