Support virtio-blk root disk controller#10229
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
do we need to update ? |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 12152 |
|
Thanks @weizhouapache, fixed @blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #10229 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 15.13% 15.13%
- Complexity 11279 11281 +2
=========================================
Files 5408 5408
Lines 474007 474009 +2
Branches 57822 57823 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 71745 71748 +3
+ Misses 394241 394238 -3
- Partials 8021 8023 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12153 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12159)
|
|
tested ok. LGTM |
Description
This PR adds support for virtio-blk devices
Fixes: #9299
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?