Skip to content

Add back missing licenses#36386

Merged
liferoad merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
users/damccorm/licenses
Oct 4, 2025
Merged

Add back missing licenses#36386
liferoad merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
users/damccorm/licenses

Conversation

@damccorm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@damccorm damccorm commented Oct 4, 2025

We missed this in #36334

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@damccorm damccorm mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2025
Merged
3 tasks
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

gemini-code-assist bot commented Oct 4, 2025

Summary of Changes

Hello @damccorm, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor but important compliance issue by restoring the Apache License header to a Python test file. The change ensures that programming_guide_test.py correctly attributes its licensing, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

Highlights

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

@github-actions github-actions bot added the python label Oct 4, 2025
@damccorm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

damccorm commented Oct 4, 2025

cc/ @hjtran

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 40.19%. Comparing base (659cc4d) to head (7e730d8).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #36386      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     40.19%   40.19%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     3386     3386              
============================================
  Files          1220     1220              
  Lines        186217   186296      +79     
  Branches       3523     3523              
============================================
+ Hits          74855    74879      +24     
- Misses       108001   108057      +56     
+ Partials       3361     3360       -1
Flag Coverage Δ
python 40.54% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@liferoad liferoad merged commit 312509f into master Oct 4, 2025
107 of 118 checks passed
@damccorm damccorm mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2025
Merged
3 tasks
@damccorm damccorm deleted the users/damccorm/licenses branch October 4, 2025 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@liferoad liferoad liferoad approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

python

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@damccorm @liferoad