GH-40060: [C++][Python] Basic conversion of RecordBatch to Arrow Tensor - add support for different data types#40359
Conversation
|
|
|
@zeroshade would you mind reviewing this feature also? |
fcfac4a to
1fbaec9
Compare
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Kietzman <bengilgit@gmail.com>
|
@bkietz the only question left open is the |
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
jorisvandenbossche
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, looking good now!
I am going to merge this so Alenka can open the follow-up PRs, but so if there is any remaining comment that can be addressed there.
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 434f872. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 10 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
What changes are included in this PR?
RecordBatcheswith fields of different type in the conversionRecordBatch→Tensor.RecordBatch.to_tensor()docstrings, see GH-40059: [C++][Python] Basic conversion of RecordBatch to Arrow Tensor #40064 (comment).Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.