GH-39579: [Python] fix raising ValueError on _ensure_partitioning#39593
GH-39579: [Python] fix raising ValueError on _ensure_partitioning#39593AlenkaF merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
|
|
|
Thank you for catching this! |
|
Can we add a test to |
Yup working on it |
|
Not sure why one of the CIs failed, seemingly unrelated. |
|
The failing build did look unrelated, triggered it again to see if it will help. |
|
The failure is not connected, I can see it elsewhere also: https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/7601318025/job/20700571533 |
Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com>
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit a7f8140. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. |
…ng (apache#39593) ### Rationale for this change The `_ensure_partitioning` method in dataset.py is missing a "raise" which currently ignores bad scheme silently. ### What changes are included in this PR? Fixed the typo. ### Are these changes tested? Tried with new code that the exception is properly raised. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39579 Lead-authored-by: idailylife <iorange@126.com> Co-authored-by: 0x0000ffff <idailylife@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alenka Frim <AlenkaF@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: AlenkaF <frim.alenka@gmail.com>
Rationale for this change
The
_ensure_partitioningmethod in dataset.py is missing a "raise" which currently ignores bad scheme silently.What changes are included in this PR?
Fixed the typo.
Are these changes tested?
Tried with new code that the exception is properly raised.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.