Before, in a situation like shown in the test, all of the initializers would be dropped, as the code would try to insert it at the hoisted property which is going to be deleted.

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Feature
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• angular.dev application / infrastructure changes
• Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Given this code:

import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { ActivatedRoute } from '@angular/router';

@Injectable()
export class MyClass {
  uninitialized!: string;

  readonly a;
  readonly b;

  constructor(private readonly route: ActivatedRoute) {
    this.a = this.route.get();
    this.b = this.a.get();
  }
}

With the internal migration enabled, the new lines of code would be dropped and this would be the output:

import { Injectable, inject } from '@angular/core';
import { ActivatedRoute } from '@angular/router';

@Injectable()
export class MyClass {}

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

import { Injectable, inject } from '@angular/core';
import { ActivatedRoute } from '@angular/router';

@Injectable()
export class MyClass {
  uninitialized!: string;

  private readonly route = inject(ActivatedRoute);
  readonly a = this.route.get();
  readonly b = this.a.get();
}

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

The internal migration would result in failures with some files.

Other information