fix(core): allow toSignal calls in reactive context#51831
Closed
pkozlowski-opensource wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Closed
fix(core): allow toSignal calls in reactive context#51831pkozlowski-opensource wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
pkozlowski-opensource wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Conversation
This PR moves the Observable subscription of toSignal outside of the reactive context. As the result the toSignal calls are allowed in the computed, effect and all other reactive consumers. This is based on the reasoning that we already allow signals creation in a reactive context. Plus a similar change was done to the async pipe in the angular#50522 Fixes angular#51027
alxhub
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2023
Member
Author
|
Re-targetting as minor since it doesn't merge cleanly to 16.2.x - will create a patch version of it when this PR lands. |
Contributor
|
This PR was merged into the repository by commit dcf18dc. |
pkozlowski-opensource
added a commit
to pkozlowski-opensource/angular
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2023
This PR moves the Observable subscription of toSignal outside of the reactive context. As the result the toSignal calls are allowed in the computed, effect and all other reactive consumers. This is based on the reasoning that we already allow signals creation in a reactive context. Plus a similar change was done to the async pipe in the angular#50522 Fixes angular#51027
dylhunn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2023
This PR moves the Observable subscription of toSignal outside of the reactive context. As the result the toSignal calls are allowed in the computed, effect and all other reactive consumers. This is based on the reasoning that we already allow signals creation in a reactive context. Plus a similar change was done to the async pipe in the #50522 Fixes #51027 PR Close #51892
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
ChellappanRajan
pushed a commit
to ChellappanRajan/angular
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2024
This PR moves the Observable subscription of toSignal outside of the reactive context. As the result the toSignal calls are allowed in the computed, effect and all other reactive consumers. This is based on the reasoning that we already allow signals creation in a reactive context. Plus a similar change was done to the async pipe in the angular#50522 Fixes angular#51027 PR Close angular#51831
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR moves the Observable subscription of toSignal outside of the reactive context. As the result the toSignal calls are allowed in the computed, effect and all other reactive consumers.
This is based on the reasoning that we already allow signals creation in a reactive context. Plus a similar change was done to the async pipe in the #50522
Fixes #51027