Skip to content

fix: #2482 Infinity and NaN serialise to null#2487

Merged
epoberezkin merged 7 commits intomasterfrom
fix-2482-serialise-infinity-nan
Sep 15, 2024
Merged

fix: #2482 Infinity and NaN serialise to null#2487
epoberezkin merged 7 commits intomasterfrom
fix-2482-serialise-infinity-nan

Conversation

@jasoniangreen
Copy link
Collaborator

@jasoniangreen jasoniangreen commented Aug 11, 2024

What issue does this pull request resolve?
#2482

What changes did you make?
Added an option to support serializing the special case numbersInfinity, -Infinity and NaN. See added docs for expected behavior but basically these options help to avoid invalid JSON when dealing with these values.

Is there anything that requires more attention while reviewing?

The tests and the new docs explain it all.

Comment on lines +232 to +241
const condition = _`${data} === Infinity || ${data} === -Infinity || Number.isNaN(${data})`
const addNumber = (): CodeGen => gen.add(N.json, _`"" + ${data}`)

if (self.opts.specialNumbers === "null") {
gen.if(condition, () => gen.add(N.json, _`null`), addNumber)
} else if (self.opts.specialNumbers === "string") {
gen.if(condition, () => gen.add(N.json, str`"${data}"`), addNumber)
} else {
addNumber()
}
Copy link
Member

@epoberezkin epoberezkin Aug 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

x !== x avoids function call overhead, the only advantage of Number.isNaN is clarity, but we're optimizing for performance here.

@epoberezkin epoberezkin merged commit 69568d0 into master Sep 15, 2024
@epoberezkin epoberezkin deleted the fix-2482-serialise-infinity-nan branch September 15, 2024 08:01
AlbinaBlazhko17 pushed a commit to Redocly/ajv that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2025
…ator#2487)

* fix: ajv-validator#2482 Infinity and NaN serialise to null

* feat: add safeNumbers option

* include test for default behavior

* change option name to specialNumbers

* refactor to be more dry

* pr feedback

* remove string option
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants