Feat: integrate processor on allocator#4302
Conversation
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: 8bf2d25e-8a25-40e8-be90-5d0f4cc67808 Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: 23eb3392-ae6d-4e04-a5e5-721180541830 Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
|
/gcbrun Will double check later on (still got some part to do on this PR - config) |
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: 945200ee-29f9-485a-94cd-0ef737615845 Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
(getting worked on from another PR) /gcbrun |
|
Build Succeeded 🥳 Build Id: 413aabcb-7e7e-4c35-9303-008da3a2bda2 The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version: |
|
Build Succeeded 🥳 Build Id: 7a9c4779-6d73-4894-a30c-047ad48dc0b4 The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version: |
cmd/allocator/main.go
Outdated
| processorAllocationTimeout = "processor-allocation-timeout" | ||
| processorReconnectInterval = "processor-reconnect-interval" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm wondering if we should just hardcode processorAllocationTimeout and processorReconnectInterval to values that work best 🤔
Do we see there being value in making them configurable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point, there is maybe not that much value to have it configurable, I'll hardcode it at the allocator level (and then on the extension one), If we see later on some value we can add it back to be configurable 👌🏼
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: 4bbed570-6bde-49ad-9e3a-90f9720ef0af Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: e2fadb55-f6e6-4ab8-93fa-36389462c74c Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
cf5dc77 to
30848e2
Compare
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: ad929e2f-bcfc-445e-bda1-168afbb389b4 Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
|
Build Failed 😭 Build Id: befed37d-e7c6-44f9-960a-db5d2a3d5f71 Status: FAILURE To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
|
Build Succeeded 🥳 Build Id: 27d4abb2-41f4-4fef-b827-4f133526c9d8 The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version: |
* feat: integrate processor on allocator * feat: update feature gates flow * feat: remove previous feature gate check * feat: rollback changes from newServiceHandler * feat: cleanup new line * feat: add config + template update * feat: remove comment * feat: update log * feat: remove processor alloc timeout and reconnect interval from config * feat: fix allocaiton template
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / Why we need it:
Integrate the processor client on the allocator + add new config
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #4190
Special notes for your reviewer: