Skip to content

mKCP transport: Make sure ACKs are limited within MTU#5773

Merged
RPRX merged 1 commit intoXTLS:mainfrom
LjhAUMEM:mkcp-mtu
Mar 7, 2026
Merged

mKCP transport: Make sure ACKs are limited within MTU#5773
RPRX merged 1 commit intoXTLS:mainfrom
LjhAUMEM:mkcp-mtu

Conversation

@LjhAUMEM
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@LjhAUMEM LjhAUMEM commented Mar 7, 2026

No description provided.

@RPRX RPRX changed the title mkcp-mtu mKCP transport: Make sure ACKs are limited within MTU Mar 7, 2026
@RPRX RPRX merged commit ea87941 into XTLS:main Mar 7, 2026
39 checks passed
drovosek229 pushed a commit to drovosek229/Xray-core that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2026
@patterniha

This comment was marked as resolved.

@RPRX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

RPRX commented Mar 19, 2026

@patterniha 新版本将很快到来,我知道 XDNS 相对于 DNSTT 的优势是支持 UDP,但为什么有人说 XDNS 能通过更多 DNS?DNSTT 和 SlipStream 不能限制成更小的 MTU 吗?另外伊朗的全国性断网增强了,仍然能查询国际上的 TXT 记录?

@patterniha
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@RPRX

Mygod/slipstream-rust#5 (comment)

Mygod/slipstream-rust#5 (comment)

TXT record is still available, also i don't think it can be easily blocked in all resolvers, unless they block at the very beginning (dpi), which can be bypassed with noise (or small ip-header-ttl or wrong udp-header checksum)

I also write two way query data transfer which works with A record too: https://github.com/patterniha/QQ-Tunnel

///

I tested and XDNS works without problem, but speed is not good, so:

1- we should use different source port to send each query
2- we should be able to use multiple resolvers To distribute queries between them and bypass rate limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants