Closed
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Opened against duckdbmaster here duckdb#5620 |
Tmonster
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
I was investigating the following crash where a checkpoint task had its underlying resources being destroyed while it was still running. The two interesting threads are the following: ``` thread #1, name = 'duckling', stop reason = signal SIGTRAP frame #0: 0x0000ffff91bb71ec frame #1: 0x0000aaaad73a38e8 duckling`duckdb::InternalException::InternalException(this=<unavailable>, msg=<unavailable>) at exception.cpp:336:2 frame #2: 0x0000aaaad786eb68 duckling`duckdb::unique_ptr<duckdb::RowGroup, std::default_delete<duckdb::RowGroup>, true>::operator*() const [inlined] duckdb::unique_ptr<duckdb::RowGroup, std::default_delete<duckdb::RowGroup>, true>::AssertNotNull(null=<unavailable>) at unique_ptr.hpp:25:10 frame #3: 0x0000aaaad786eaf4 duckling`duckdb::unique_ptr<duckdb::RowGroup, std::default_delete<duckdb::RowGroup>, true>::operator*(this=0x0000aaacbb73e008) const at unique_ptr.hpp:34:4 frame #4: 0x0000aaaad787abbc duckling`duckdb::CheckpointTask::ExecuteTask(this=0x0000aaabec92be60) at row_group_collection.cpp:732:21 frame #5: 0x0000aaaad7756ea4 duckling`duckdb::BaseExecutorTask::Execute(this=0x0000aaabec92be60, mode=<unavailable>) at task_executor.cpp:72:3 frame #6: 0x0000aaaad7757e28 duckling`duckdb::TaskScheduler::ExecuteForever(this=0x0000aaaafda30e10, marker=0x0000aaaafda164a8) at task_scheduler.cpp:189:32 frame #7: 0x0000ffff91a031fc frame #8: 0x0000ffff91c0d5c8 thread #120, stop reason = signal 0 frame #0: 0x0000ffff91c71c24 frame #1: 0x0000ffff91e1264c frame #2: 0x0000ffff91e01888 frame #3: 0x0000ffff91e018f8 frame #4: 0x0000ffff91e01c10 frame #5: 0x0000ffff91e05afc frame #6: 0x0000ffff91e05e70 frame #7: 0x0000aaaad784b63c duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(this=<unavailable>) at shared_ptr_base.h:184:10 frame #8: 0x0000aaaad784b5b4 duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count(this=<unavailable>) at shared_ptr_base.h:705:11 frame #9: 0x0000aaaad784b5ac duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] std::__shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr(this=<unavailable>) at shared_ptr_base.h:1154:31 frame #10: 0x0000aaaad784b5ac duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>::~shared_ptr(this=<unavailable>) at shared_ptr_ipp.hpp:115:24 frame #11: 0x0000aaaad784b5ac duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] void std::_Destroy<duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>>(__pointer=<unavailable>) at stl_construct.h:151:19 frame #12: 0x0000aaaad784b5ac duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] void std::_Destroy_aux<false>::__destroy<duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>*>(__first=<unavailable>, __last=<unavailable>) at stl_construct.h:163:6 frame #13: 0x0000aaaad784b5a0 duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] void std::_Destroy<duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>*>(__first=<unavailable>, __last=<unavailable>) at stl_construct.h:195:7 frame #14: 0x0000aaaad784b5a0 duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] void std::_Destroy<duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>*, duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>>(__first=<unavailable>, __last=<unavailable>, (null)=<unavailable>) at alloc_traits.h:848:7 frame #15: 0x0000aaaad784b5a0 duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup() [inlined] std::vector<duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>, std::allocator<duckdb::shared_ptr<duckdb::ColumnData, true>>>::~vector(this=<unavailable>) at stl_vector.h:680:2 frame #16: 0x0000aaaad784b5a0 duckling`duckdb::RowGroup::~RowGroup(this=<unavailable>) at row_group.cpp:83:1 frame #17: 0x0000aaaad786ee18 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() [inlined] std::default_delete<duckdb::RowGroup>::operator()(this=0x0000aaacbb73e1a8, __ptr=0x0000aaab75ae7860) const at unique_ptr.h:85:2 frame #18: 0x0000aaaad786ee10 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() at unique_ptr.h:361:4 frame #19: 0x0000aaaad786ee08 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() [inlined] duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>::~SegmentNode(this=0x0000aaacbb73e1a0) at segment_tree.hpp:21:8 frame #20: 0x0000aaaad786ee08 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() [inlined] void std::_Destroy<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>(__pointer=0x0000aaacbb73e1a0) at stl_construct.h:151:19 frame #21: 0x0000aaaad786ee08 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() [inlined] void std::_Destroy_aux<false>::__destroy<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>*>(__first=0x0000aaacbb73e1a0, __last=0x0000aaacbb751130) at stl_construct.h:163:6 frame #22: 0x0000aaaad786ede8 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() [inlined] void std::_Destroy<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>*>(__first=<unavailable>, __last=0x0000aaacbb751130) at stl_construct.h:195:7 frame #23: 0x0000aaaad786ede8 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector() [inlined] void std::_Destroy<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>*, duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>(__first=<unavailable>, __last=0x0000aaacbb751130, (null)=0x0000fffefc81a908) at alloc_traits.h:848:7 frame #24: 0x0000aaaad786ede8 duckling`std::vector<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>, std::allocator<duckdb::SegmentNode<duckdb::RowGroup>>>::~vector(this=size=4883) at stl_vector.h:680:2 frame #25: 0x0000aaaad7857f74 duckling`duckdb::RowGroupCollection::Checkpoint(this=<unavailable>, writer=<unavailable>, global_stats=0x0000fffefc81a9c0) at row_group_collection.cpp:1017:1 frame #26: 0x0000aaaad788f02c duckling`duckdb::DataTable::Checkpoint(this=0x0000aaab04649e70, writer=0x0000aaab6584ea80, serializer=0x0000fffefc81ab38) at data_table.cpp:1427:14 frame #27: 0x0000aaaad7881394 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::WriteTable(this=0x0000fffefc81b128, table=0x0000aaab023b78c0, serializer=0x0000fffefc81ab38) at checkpoint_manager.cpp:528:11 frame #28: 0x0000aaaad787ece4 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint() [inlined] duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint(this=<unavailable>, obj=0x0000fffefc81ab38)::$_7::operator()(duckdb::Serializer::List&, unsigned long) const::'lambda'(duckdb::Serializer&)::operator()(duckdb::Serializer&) const at checkpoint_manager.cpp:181:43 frame #29: 0x0000aaaad787ecd8 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint() [inlined] void duckdb::Serializer::List::WriteObject<duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint()::$_7::operator()(duckdb::Serializer::List&, unsigned long) const::'lambda'(duckdb::Serializer&)>(this=<unavailable>, f=(unnamed class) @ 0x0000600002cbd2b0) at serializer.hpp:385:2 frame #30: 0x0000aaaad787ecc4 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint() [inlined] duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint()::$_7::operator()(this=<unavailable>, list=<unavailable>, i=2) const at checkpoint_manager.cpp:181:8 frame #31: 0x0000aaaad787ecb0 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint() at serializer.hpp:151:4 frame #32: 0x0000aaaad787ec94 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileCheckpointWriter::CreateCheckpoint(this=0x0000fffefc81b128) at checkpoint_manager.cpp:179:13 frame #33: 0x0000aaaad78954a8 duckling`duckdb::SingleFileStorageManager::CreateCheckpoint(this=0x0000aaaafe1de140, options=(wal_action = DONT_DELETE_WAL, action = CHECKPOINT_IF_REQUIRED, type = FULL_CHECKPOINT)) at storage_manager.cpp:365:17 frame #34: 0x0000aaaad78baac0 duckling`duckdb::DuckTransactionManager::Checkpoint(this=0x0000aaaafe167e00, context=<unavailable>, force=<unavailable>) at duck_transaction_manager.cpp:198:18 frame #35: 0x0000aaaad69d02c0 duckling`md::Server::BackgroundCheckpointIfNeeded(this=0x0000aaaafdbfe900) at server.cpp:1983:31 frame #36: 0x0000aaaadac5d3f0 duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run() [inlined] std::function<void ()>::operator()(this=<unavailable>) const at std_function.h:590:9 frame #37: 0x0000aaaadac5d3e0 duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run() [inlined] md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0::operator()(this=0x0000aaaafdf169a8) const at background_cron_task.cpp:25:4 frame #38: 0x0000aaaadac5d30c duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run() [inlined] void std::__invoke_impl<void, md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>((null)=<unavailable>, __f=0x0000aaaafdf169a8) at invoke.h:61:14 frame #39: 0x0000aaaadac5d30c duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run() [inlined] std::__invoke_result<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>::type std::__invoke<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>(__fn=0x0000aaaafdf169a8) at invoke.h:96:14 frame #40: 0x0000aaaadac5d30c duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run() [inlined] void std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>::_M_invoke<0ul>(this=0x0000aaaafdf169a8, (null)=<unavailable>) at std_thread.h:259:13 frame #41: 0x0000aaaadac5d30c duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run() [inlined] std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>::operator()(this=0x0000aaaafdf169a8) at std_thread.h:266:11 frame #42: 0x0000aaaadac5d30c duckling`std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<md::BackgroundCronTask::Start(unsigned long)::$_0>>>::_M_run(this=0x0000aaaafdf169a0) at std_thread.h:211:13 frame #43: 0x0000ffff91a031fc frame #44: 0x0000ffff91c0d5c8 ``` The problem is that if there's an IO exception being thrown in `RowGroupCollection::Checkpoint` after some (but not all) checkpoint tasks have been scheduled but before `checkpoint_state.executor.WorkOnTasks();` is called, it results in an InternalException / DuckDB crash as the `Checkpoint ` method does not wait for the scheduled tasks to have completed before destroying the referenced resources.
Tmonster
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2025
Fixes duckdblabs/duckdb-internal#3922 The failing query ```SQL SET order_by_non_integer_literal=true; SELECT DISTINCT ON ( 'string' ) 'string', GROUP BY CUBE ( 'string', ), 'string' IN ( SELECT 'string' ), HAVING 'string' IN ( SELECT 'string'); ``` The Plan generated before optimization is below. During optimization there is an attempt to convert the mark join into a semi. Before this conversion takes place, we usually check to make sure the mark join is not used in any operators above the mark join to prevent plan verification errors. Up until this point, only logical projections were checked for mark joins. Turns out this query is planned in such a way that the mark join is in one of the expressions of the aggregate operator. This was not checked, so the mark to semi conversion would take place. The fix is to modify the filter pushdown optimization so that it stores table indexes from logical aggregate operators. ``` ┌───────────────────────────┐ │ PROJECTION #1 │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ Expressions: #[2.0] │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ FILTER │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ Expressions: #[2.1] │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ AGGREGATE #2, #3, #4 │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ Groups: │ │ 'string' │ │ #[14.0] │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ COMPARISON_JOIN │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ Join Type: MARK │ │ ├──────────────┐ │ Conditions: │ │ │ ('string' = #[8.0]) │ │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ │ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ DUMMY_SCAN #0 ││ PROJECTION #8 │ │ ──────────────────── ││ ──────────────────── │ │ ││ Expressions: 'string' │ └───────────────────────────┘└─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ DUMMY_SCAN #7 │ │ ──────────────────── │ └───────────────────────────┘ ```
Tmonster
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2025
We had two users crash with the following backtrace:
```
frame #0: 0x0000ffffab2571ec
frame #1: 0x0000aaaaac00c5fc duckling`duckdb::InternalException::InternalException(this=<unavailable>, msg=<unavailable>) at exception.cpp:328:2
frame #2: 0x0000aaaaac1ee418 duckling`duckdb::optional_ptr<duckdb::OptimisticDataWriter, true>::CheckValid(this=<unavailable>) const at optional_ptr.hpp:34:11
frame #3: 0x0000aaaaac1eea8c duckling`duckdb::MergeCollectionTask::Execute(duckdb::PhysicalBatchInsert const&, duckdb::ClientContext&, duckdb::GlobalSinkState&, duckdb::LocalSinkState&) [inlined] duckdb::optional_ptr<duckdb::OptimisticDataWriter, true>::operator*(this=<unavailable>) at optional_ptr.hpp:43:3
frame #4: 0x0000aaaaac1eea84 duckling`duckdb::MergeCollectionTask::Execute(this=0x0000aaaaf1b06150, op=<unavailable>, context=0x0000aaaba820d8d0, gstate_p=0x0000aaab06880f00, lstate_p=<unavailable>) at physical_batch_insert.cpp:219:90
frame #5: 0x0000aaaaac1d2e10 duckling`duckdb::PhysicalBatchInsert::Sink(duckdb::ExecutionContext&, duckdb::DataChunk&, duckdb::OperatorSinkInput&) const [inlined] duckdb::PhysicalBatchInsert::ExecuteTask(this=0x0000aaaafa62ab40, context=<unavailable>, gstate_p=0x0000aaab06880f00, lstate_p=0x0000aab12d442960) const at physical_batch_insert.cpp:425:8
frame #6: 0x0000aaaaac1d2dd8 duckling`duckdb::PhysicalBatchInsert::Sink(duckdb::ExecutionContext&, duckdb::DataChunk&, duckdb::OperatorSinkInput&) const [inlined] duckdb::PhysicalBatchInsert::ExecuteTasks(this=0x0000aaaafa62ab40, context=<unavailable>, gstate_p=0x0000aaab06880f00, lstate_p=0x0000aab12d442960) const at physical_batch_insert.cpp:431:9
frame #7: 0x0000aaaaac1d2dd8 duckling`duckdb::PhysicalBatchInsert::Sink(this=0x0000aaaafa62ab40, context=0x0000aab2fffd7cb0, chunk=<unavailable>, input=<unavailable>) const at physical_batch_insert.cpp:494:4
frame #8: 0x0000aaaaac353158 duckling`duckdb::PipelineExecutor::ExecutePushInternal(duckdb::DataChunk&, duckdb::ExecutionBudget&, unsigned long) [inlined] duckdb::PipelineExecutor::Sink(this=0x0000aab2fffd7c00, chunk=0x0000aab2fffd7d30, input=0x0000fffec0aba8d8) at pipeline_executor.cpp:521:24
frame #9: 0x0000aaaaac353130 duckling`duckdb::PipelineExecutor::ExecutePushInternal(this=0x0000aab2fffd7c00, input=0x0000aab2fffd7d30, chunk_budget=0x0000fffec0aba980, initial_idx=0) at pipeline_executor.cpp:332:23
frame #10: 0x0000aaaaac34f7b4 duckling`duckdb::PipelineExecutor::Execute(this=0x0000aab2fffd7c00, max_chunks=<unavailable>) at pipeline_executor.cpp:201:13
frame #11: 0x0000aaaaac34f258 duckling`duckdb::PipelineTask::ExecuteTask(duckdb::TaskExecutionMode) [inlined] duckdb::PipelineExecutor::Execute(this=<unavailable>) at pipeline_executor.cpp:278:9
frame #12: 0x0000aaaaac34f250 duckling`duckdb::PipelineTask::ExecuteTask(this=0x0000aab16dafd630, mode=<unavailable>) at pipeline.cpp:51:33
frame #13: 0x0000aaaaac348298 duckling`duckdb::ExecutorTask::Execute(this=0x0000aab16dafd630, mode=<unavailable>) at executor_task.cpp:49:11
frame #14: 0x0000aaaaac356600 duckling`duckdb::TaskScheduler::ExecuteForever(this=0x0000aaaaf0105560, marker=0x0000aaaaf00ee578) at task_scheduler.cpp:189:32
frame #15: 0x0000ffffab0a31fc
frame #16: 0x0000ffffab2ad5c8
```
Core dump analysis showed that the assertion `D_ASSERT(lstate.writer);`
in `MergeCollectionTask::Execute` (i.e. it is crashing because
`lstate.writer` is NULLPTR) was not satisfied when
`PhysicalBatchInsert::Sink` was processing merge tasks from (other)
pipeline executors.
My suspicion is that this is only likely to happen for heavily
concurrent workloads (applicable to the two users which crashed). The
patch submitted as part of this PR has addressed the issue for these
users.
Tmonster
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 12, 2026
…0283) Fix for: duckdblabs/duckdb-internal#6809 , duckdb#20086 I would like someone to take a look at this before I run CI, to see if the fix makes sense. In ConstantOrNullFunction, there is a bug where if the first loop iteration is a FLAT_VECTOR, the result validity mask is created as a reference to the validity mask of args.data[idx]. If the subsequent iteration is the default branch (say, a DICTIONARY_VECTOR), and we call result_mask.SetInvalid(i), this is now overwriting the validity mask of the first input column where the reference was created. I believe the fix for this is to call EnsureWritable in the FLAT_VECTOR case, to make sure the validity mask is not a reference to the input's validity mask before we call ```cpp result_mask.Combine(input_mask, args.size()) ``` (which is where the alias is actually created). The reproducer hits this case -- a specific scenario of unique index + update + no checkpointing was leading to the this scenario. For reference, here is the query plan of the last query in the reproducer, where the bug was occuring. The t1.c0 column is being passed as a FLAT_VECTOR to constantOrNullFunction, and the t0.c1 column is being passed in as a dictionary vector. Since the argument at index 1 in ConstantOrNullFunction is the c0 column in the output, we were overwriting NULLs into the ouput since the filter was overwriting the validity mask in ConstantOrNullFunction: ``` ┌───────┬───────┬───────┐ │ c0 │ c0 │ c1 │ │ int32 │ int32 │ int32 │ ├───────┼───────┼───────┤ │ NULL │ 1 │ NULL │ │ NULL │ -1 │ NULL │ └───────┴───────┴───────┘ ``` Whereas it should be: ``` ┌───────┬───────┬───────┐ │ c0 │ c0 │ c1 │ │ int32 │ int32 │ int32 │ ├───────┼───────┼───────┤ │ 0 │ 1 │ NULL │ │ NULL │ -1 │ NULL │ └───────┴───────┴───────┘ ``` ```┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ ││ Total Time: 9.18s ││ │└──────────────────────────────────────────────┘│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌───────────────────────────┐ │ QUERY │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ EXPLAIN_ANALYZE │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ 0 rows │ │ (0.00s) │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ PROJECTION │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ c0 │ │ c0 │ │ c1 │ │ │ │ 2 rows │ │ (0.00s) │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ PROJECTION │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ #3 │ │ #7 │ │ #11 │ │ │ │ 2 rows │ │ (0.00s) │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ FILTER │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ (constant_or_null(false, │ │ c0, c1) IS NULL) │ │ │ │ 2 rows │ │ (1.82s) │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ PROJECTION │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ NULL │ │ #6 │ │ NULL │ │ #5 │ │ NULL │ │ #4 │ │ NULL │ │ #3 │ │ NULL │ │ #2 │ │ NULL │ │ #1 │ │ NULL │ │ #0 │ │ NULL │ │ │ │ 2 rows │ │ (0.00s) │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ PROJECTION │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ NULL │ │ #2 │ │ NULL │ │ #1 │ │ NULL │ │ #0 │ │ NULL │ │ │ │ 2 rows │ │ (0.00s) │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ POSITIONAL_SCAN │ │ ──────────────────── │ │ 2 rows ├──────────────┐ │ (7.30s) │ │ └─────────────┬─────────────┘ │ ┌─────────────┴─────────────┐┌─────────────┴─────────────┐ │ TABLE_SCAN ││ TABLE_SCAN │ │ ──────────────────── ││ ──────────────────── │ │ Table: t1 ││ Table: t0 │ │ Type: Sequential Scan ││ Type: Sequential Scan │ │ Projections: c0 ││ │ │ ││ Projections: │ │ ││ c1 │ │ ││ c0 │ │ ││ │ │ 0 rows ││ 0 rows │ │ (0.00s) ││ (0.00s) │ └───────────────────────────┘└───────────────────────────┘ ```
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Will fix duckdb#5097