feat: extraction of boundary types from various docstrings#111
Conversation
Added some new rules It is now possible to extract multiple boundaries.
Minimal refactoring was done. Some test cases were added.
Some test cases were added.
🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports |
…ontain-boundary-type
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #111 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.08% 90.40% +0.31%
==========================================
Files 82 83 +1
Lines 4084 4334 +250
==========================================
+ Hits 3679 3918 +239
- Misses 405 416 +11
|
…rings-that-contain-boundary-type' into 48-extraction-from-various-docstrings-that-contain-boundary-type
|
@lars-reimann |
|
@nvollroth Add a comment |
Return type of the create function is now BoundaryType. Added one new pattern + test case. Corrected the error suppression for ruff.
…ontain-boundary-type
|
@nvollroth The lint check passes now. |
…ontain-boundary-type
…rings-that-contain-boundary-type' into 48-extraction-from-various-docstrings-that-contain-boundary-type
Added 1 Testcase
Added some Testcases
|
@lars-reimann |
Closes #48, closes #36, closes #35, closes #32, closes #31, closes #30, closes #27, closes #8.
Summary of Changes
SpaCy rules were generated to recognize named examples and extract the resulting boundaries.
Instructions for Manual Testing (if required)
pytestfortest_extract_boundary_values.py.pytest.